Kusleika R, Stupp S I
J Biomed Mater Res. 1983 May;17(3):441-58. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820170305.
A device was constructed to test the interfacial strength of PMMA-based bone cement and human cancellous bone under pure tension. Two types of tissue were used in the investigation: (1) formalin-fixed vertebral bone as an in vitro model for weak cancellous bone, and (2) freshly removed metatarsal bone. Tissue--cement joints were allowed to solidify under two different pressures (0.11 and 0.47 MPa), and cement placement time on tissue surfaces was also controlled as a variable. The higher curing pressure only seemed to enhance the strength of interfaces formed with mechanically weak fixed bone but had no significant effect for joints formed with the stronger, freshly extracted tissue. Cement placement time did not have a discernible effect on interfacial strength regardless of the tissue used or the pressure applied during setting. An analysis of fracture morphology by optical microscopy revealed largely cement cohesive failure in some cases and bone or mixed fractures in others. Joints exhibiting mainly cement fracture had the highest interfacial tensile strengths (in the order of 7.5 MPa). Once measured values of tissue porosity were taken into account, the observed joint strength correlated well with cement tensile strength. Based on experimental findings, better stress-dissipating qualities and higher tensile strength are suggested as two important necessary improvements of bone cements based on poly(methyl methacrylate).
构建了一种装置,用于在纯拉伸条件下测试聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯基骨水泥与人体松质骨之间的界面强度。研究中使用了两种类型的组织:(1)福尔马林固定的椎骨作为弱松质骨的体外模型,以及(2)新鲜切除的跖骨。组织 - 水泥关节在两种不同压力(0.11和0.47 MPa)下固化,并且水泥在组织表面的放置时间也作为一个变量进行控制。较高的固化压力似乎仅增强了与机械性能较弱的固定骨形成的界面强度,但对与更强的新鲜提取组织形成的关节没有显著影响。无论使用何种组织或固化过程中施加的压力如何,水泥放置时间对界面强度均无明显影响。通过光学显微镜对断裂形态的分析表明,在某些情况下主要是水泥内聚破坏,而在其他情况下是骨或混合骨折。主要表现为水泥断裂的关节具有最高的界面拉伸强度(约7.5 MPa)。一旦考虑到组织孔隙率的测量值,观察到的关节强度与水泥拉伸强度密切相关。基于实验结果,更好的应力消散性能和更高的拉伸强度被认为是聚(甲基丙烯酸甲酯)基骨水泥的两个重要必要改进。