Suppr超能文献

六种用于气管内麻醉的人工鼻的实验室研究。

Laboratory investigation of six artificial noses for use during endotracheal anesthesia.

作者信息

Weeks D B, Ramsey F M

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1983 Aug;62(8):758-63.

PMID:6869864
Abstract

The performances of six commercially available heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) or "artificial noses," were evaluated in the laboratory. Each HME was studied with both a semiclosed anesthesia circuit (SCAC) and a nonrebreathing anesthesia system (NRS). Our results suggest that the Servohumidifier 150 and the Engström Edith are suitable for replacing nasopharyngeal humidification mechanisms bypassed during endotracheal ventilation in all patients because they provided at least 20 mg of water per liter of minute ventilation (mg/L) in an NRS and 28 mg/L in an SCAC during inspiration. While the other four units were suitable for small tidal volumes, they only marginally satisfied minimal suggested humidity levels in the presence of larger tidal volumes.

摘要

在实验室中对六种市售的热湿交换器(HME)或“人工鼻”的性能进行了评估。每种热湿交换器都在半封闭麻醉回路(SCAC)和无重复吸入麻醉系统(NRS)中进行了研究。我们的结果表明,Servohumidifier 150和Engström Edith适用于替代所有患者气管内通气期间绕过的鼻咽部加湿机制,因为它们在吸气期间在NRS中每分钟通气量每升提供至少20毫克水(mg/L),在SCAC中为28毫克/升。虽然其他四个装置适用于小潮气量,但在大潮气量情况下,它们仅略微满足最低建议湿度水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验