Hainsworth R, Karim F, McGregor K H, Wood L M
J Physiol. 1983 Apr;337:417-28. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014632.
In anaesthetized dogs a hind limb was vascularly isolated, perfused through the femoral artery at either constant flow or constant pressure and drained from the femoral vein at constant pressure. Inflow and outflow were recorded. Vascular-resistance changes were calculated from changes in pressure or flow and volume changes from the differences between inflow and outflow. During constant-flow perfusion, both changes in carotid sinus pressure and direct stimulation of efferent sympathetic nerves resulted in large resistance responses. However, changes in carotid sinus pressure did not result in changes in limb blood volume and only small decreases were obtained in response to direct stimulation. During constant-pressure perfusion, both reflex and direct stimulation resulted not only in significant changes in resistance but also in significant volume changes which were much larger than those obtained during constant-flow perfusion. Similar responses were obtained when the flow rate was changed by altering the pump speed. These results indicate that changes in pressure to carotid baroreceptors do not result in active capacitance responses in the limb circulation and that only very small responses are obtained even to electrical stimulation of sympathetic nerves. The larger responses occurring during constant-pressure perfusion are thought to be secondary to changes in blood flow.
在麻醉犬中,将其后肢进行血管隔离,通过股动脉以恒流或恒压方式灌注,并通过股静脉以恒压方式引流。记录流入量和流出量。根据压力或流量的变化计算血管阻力变化,并根据流入量与流出量之间的差异计算容积变化。在恒流灌注期间,颈动脉窦压力的变化和传出交感神经的直接刺激均导致较大的阻力反应。然而,颈动脉窦压力的变化并未导致肢体血容量的变化,并且对直接刺激的反应仅出现少量减少。在恒压灌注期间,反射和直接刺激不仅导致阻力的显著变化,还导致容积的显著变化,这些变化比恒流灌注期间获得的变化大得多。当通过改变泵速来改变流速时,也获得了类似的反应。这些结果表明,对颈动脉压力感受器的压力变化不会导致肢体循环中的主动容量反应,并且即使对交感神经进行电刺激也只会获得非常小的反应。恒压灌注期间出现的较大反应被认为是血流变化的继发结果。