DiSessa T G, Zednikova M, Hiraishi S, Jarmakani J M, Higgins C B, Friedman W F
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):687-91. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878685.
A prospective study was performed in 30 children under 3 years of age to compare the cardiovascular effects of a nonionic contrast material of low osmolality, metrizamide, with those of a conventional ionic contrast material, meglumine sodium diatrizoate. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular peak systolic pressure, heart rate, echocardiographically obtained end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension, and blood chemistries were obtained before and after angiography. Neither contrast material changed serum sodium, potassium, or creatinine levels. However, serum osmolality rose significantly following injection of diatrizoate, but not metrizamide. Both end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions increased after diatrizoate injection. However, end-diastolic dimension was unchanged and end-systolic dimension fell after metrizamide infusion. Both contrast materials raised left ventricular peak systolic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after injection; the magnitude of these pressure changes was the same for both agents. Heart rate increased with diatrizoate to a significantly greater degree than with metrizamide. There was no difference in the quality of radiographic opacification. It is concluded that although the effects on intracardiac pressures are similar for both contrast materials, metrizamide may be advantageous in the critically ill infant because it causes a smaller increase in osmolality, fewer changes in cardiac dimensions, and a reduced heart rate challenge.