Barry A L, Jones R N, Thornsberry C
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Aug;80(2):182-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.2.182.
The relationship of cefuroxime in vitro susceptibility tests to similar cephalosporins (cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cephalothin) was evaluated using 396 recent clinical isolates. The previously published interpretive criteria of greater than or equal to 18 mm (less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/mL) = susceptible and less than or equal to 14 mm (greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/mL) = resistant for each drug were considered appropriate. The results of all study methods demonstrated cefuroxime to be slightly less active than cefamandole against most species, yet both drugs possessed nearly identical antimicrobial spectra. Cephalothin and cefoxitin were confirmed to have spectra significantly different from cefamandole and from each other, thus requiring separate testing. The application of the "class representative" concept to cefuroxime and cefamandole seems justified. Use of a 30-micrograms cefuroxime disk yielded the best predictive results and minimized the number of false-susceptible (very major) interpretive errors. Quality control guidelines are presented in a tentative form for cefuroxime, and modifications in the cephalothin and cefamandole zone limits are suggested.
使用396株近期临床分离株评估了头孢呋辛体外药敏试验与类似头孢菌素(头孢孟多、头孢西丁和头孢噻吩)之间的关系。每种药物先前公布的解释标准为大于或等于18 mm(小于或等于8.0微克/毫升)=敏感,小于或等于14 mm(大于或等于32微克/毫升)=耐药,被认为是合适的。所有研究方法的结果表明,头孢呋辛对大多数菌种的活性略低于头孢孟多,但两种药物的抗菌谱几乎相同。头孢噻吩和头孢西丁的抗菌谱与头孢孟多以及它们彼此之间均有显著差异,因此需要单独检测。将“类代表”概念应用于头孢呋辛和头孢孟多似乎是合理的。使用含30微克头孢呋辛的药敏纸片可产生最佳预测结果,并将假敏感(非常主要)解释错误的数量降至最低。以暂定形式给出了头孢呋辛的质量控制指南,并建议对头孢噻吩和头孢孟多的抑菌圈界限进行修改。