Barry A L, Thornsberry C, Jones R N, Fuchs P C, Gavan T L, Gerlach E H
Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Dec;70(6):909-13. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/70.6.909.
Reassessment of the "class" concept of disk susceptibility testing. Cephalothin disks versus minimal inhibitory concentrations with eleven cephalosporins. Am J Clin Pathol 70: 909--913, 1978. Studies were carried out to determine whether susceptibility or resistance to 11 cephalosporins could be predicted reliably from the results of tests with a single cephalothin disk. The cephalosporins were tested with a microdilution technic and with a standardized disk test. Strains susceptible to a cephalothin disk were predictably susceptible to all other cephalosporins. However, 2--12% of the strains were resistant to cephalothin disks but were susceptible to the more active parenteral drugs cefoxitin, cephamandole, cefuroxime, and BL-S786. Because of differences in antimicrobial activities, the cephalosporins could be divided into three subgroups for purposes of susceptibility testing: one subgroup includes the majority of cephalosporins and may be represented by tests with cephalothin, the second subgroup inclues three active parenteral drugs (cephamandole, cefuroxime, and BL-S786) and may be represented by tests with cefuroxime, and the third subgroup consists of cefoxitin, a cephamycin with a unique broad spectrum of activity. Until the drugs in the second and third subgroups are released for general therapeutic use, the practice of testing only one cephalosporin disk appears to be a reasonably reliable procedure.
重新评估纸片药敏试验的“类别”概念。头孢噻吩纸片与11种头孢菌素的最低抑菌浓度。《美国临床病理学杂志》70: 909 - 913, 1978年。开展研究以确定能否根据单一头孢噻吩纸片的试验结果可靠地预测对11种头孢菌素的敏感或耐药情况。采用微量稀释技术和标准化纸片试验对头孢菌素进行检测。对头孢噻吩纸片敏感的菌株可预测对所有其他头孢菌素敏感。然而,2% - 12%的菌株对头孢噻吩纸片耐药,但对活性更强的肠外用药头孢西丁、头孢孟多、头孢呋辛和BL - S786敏感。由于抗菌活性存在差异,为进行药敏试验,可将头孢菌素分为三个亚组:一个亚组包括大多数头孢菌素,可用头孢噻吩试验代表;第二个亚组包括三种活性肠外用药(头孢孟多、头孢呋辛和BL - S786),可用头孢呋辛试验代表;第三个亚组由头孢西丁组成,它是一种具有独特广谱活性的头霉素。在第二和第三亚组的药物用于一般治疗之前,仅检测一种头孢菌素纸片的做法似乎是一种相当可靠的程序。