Williamson D A, Jarrell M P, Monguillot J E, Hutchinson P
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1983 Mar;8(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01000535.
Thirty-four student volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three feedback sensitivity conditions: high sensitivity, medium sensitivity, or low sensitivity. Each subject received four sessions of biofeedback training with instructions to accelerate heart rate. In each condition, analogue feedback was provided during heart-rate acceleration trials. In addition to heart rate, frontal EMG and digital skin temperature were also recorded. Results replicated and extended the findings of a previous study in that medium and low sensitivity feedback was found to be superior to high sensitivity feedback during the final training session. These results confirm previous findings that a high sensitivity feedback produces very poor control of heart-rate acceleration. These data were discussed in terms of motor skills theory and in terms of possible effects of feedback sensitivity upon the motivation of subjects.
34名学生志愿者被随机分配到三种反馈敏感性条件之一:高敏感性、中等敏感性或低敏感性。每个受试者接受了四次生物反馈训练,并被要求加快心率。在每种条件下,在心率加速试验期间提供模拟反馈。除了心率,还记录了额部肌电图和手指皮肤温度。结果重复并扩展了先前一项研究的结果,即在最后一次训练期间,中等和低敏感性反馈被发现优于高敏感性反馈。这些结果证实了先前的发现,即高敏感性反馈对心率加速的控制非常差。从运动技能理论以及反馈敏感性对受试者动机可能产生的影响方面对这些数据进行了讨论。