Bouchard M A, Granger L
J Gen Psychol. 1980 Oct;103(2d Half):287-301. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1980.9921009.
Two studies are reported which examined the relative effects of the pressence and absence of monetary incentives and instructions in a heart rate (HR) regulation task. Twelve male undergraduates were offered seven sessions of feedback assisted voluntary HR control training. In Experiment 1 six S s attempted to increase their HR with the aid of a "success," or positive binary visual signal. In Experiment 2 six S s were instructed to decrease their HR and were assisted by a "failure," or negative binary visual signal. In both studies the presence or absence of E's specific instructions to control HR was systematically varied from sessions 4 to 7. S s were paid on only half of the feedback trials of each session. These variables were thus systematically varied in a within-subject design. The main results suggest that (a) the instructions and monetary incentives significantly facilitated HR acceleration while showing no effects on HR deceleration; (b) in the no-instructions, no-incentive condition, HR control was minimal. The general hypothesis that Estes' interpretation of information and reward apply to human voluntary HR control received some support. It would appear that contrary to a traditional view, the exteroceptive feedback per se does not necessarily act as a reinforcer of the behavior, as witnessed for instance in the no-instructions, no-incentive conditions.
本文报告了两项研究,这两项研究考察了在心率(HR)调节任务中,金钱激励和指导的有无所产生的相对影响。十二名男性本科生接受了七节反馈辅助的自愿心率控制训练。在实验1中,六名被试试图借助“成功”或正向二元视觉信号来提高他们的心率。在实验2中,六名被试被要求降低他们的心率,并借助“失败”或负向二元视觉信号。在两项研究中,从第4节到第7节,主试关于控制心率的具体指导的有无被系统地改变。每个节次的反馈试验中只有一半被试得到报酬。因此,这些变量在被试内设计中被系统地改变。主要结果表明:(a)指导和金钱激励显著促进了心率加快,而对心率减慢没有影响;(b)在无指导、无激励的条件下,心率控制程度最低。埃斯蒂斯对信息和奖励的解释适用于人类自愿心率控制这一总体假设得到了一些支持。似乎与传统观点相反,外部感受反馈本身不一定起到行为强化物的作用,例如在无指导、无激励的条件下就可以看到这一点。