Suppr超能文献

一种测量窦房传导时间的新方法。

A new method for measurement of sinoatrial conduction time.

作者信息

Narula O S, Shantha N, Vasquez M, Towne W D, Linhart J W

出版信息

Circulation. 1978 Oct;58(4):706-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.706.

Abstract

This study describes a new method (NM) for estimation of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT), which utilizes constant atrial pacing (AP) instead of the premature atrial beats (PABs) used in the method reported in 1973 by Strauss et al. The SACTs were obtained by both methods in 20 patients. The SACT by the Strauss method (SM) was calculated as A2A3 minus A1A1. The NM consists of high right AP for a train of eight consecutive beats at rates less than or equal to 10 beats/min faster than the sinus rhythm. The interval between the last paced atrial electrogram (Ap) and the first escape atrial electrogram (A) of sinus origin (Ap-A) was measured along with several post pacing sinus cycles. The SACT by the NM was calculated as follows: SACT = Ap-A minus A1A1. The effect of AP at higher rates was also analyzed. In two patients, the SACT with the SM could not be defined, as all the A2A3 intervals were fully compensatory; with the NM the SACT was 217 and 320 msec. In the remaining 18 patients the SACT was obtainable by both methods. With SM, the SACT ranged 105--452 msec (mean 219 +/- 102 SD) and with the NM it was 85--492 msec (mean 201 +/- 112 SD), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0162). The coefficient of correlation between the two methods was r = 0.97. During AP at faster rates, a rate related increment in Ap-A intervals and also post pacing sinus cycles was noted. This study describes a new and simple method for measurement of SACT in man.

摘要

本研究描述了一种用于估算窦房传导时间(SACT)的新方法(NM),该方法采用持续性心房起搏(AP),而非1973年施特劳斯等人报告的方法中所使用的房性早搏(PABs)。对20例患者同时采用这两种方法获取SACT。施特劳斯方法(SM)计算的SACT为A2A3减去A1A1。NM包括以比窦性心律快不到或等于10次/分钟的速率进行连续8次搏动的高位右房AP。测量最后一次起搏心房电图(Ap)与窦性起源的第一次逸搏心房电图(A)之间的间期(Ap - A)以及几个起搏后窦性周期。NM计算的SACT如下:SACT = Ap - A减去A1A1。还分析了更高频率AP的影响。在2例患者中,由于所有A2A3间期均为完全代偿性,无法用SM确定SACT;而用NM时,SACT分别为217和320毫秒。在其余18例患者中,两种方法均可获得SACT。采用SM时,SACT范围为105 - 452毫秒(平均219 ± 102标准差),采用NM时为85 - 492毫秒(平均201 ± 112标准差),差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0162)。两种方法之间的相关系数r = 0.97。在更快频率的AP期间,注意到Ap - A间期以及起搏后窦性周期随频率增加。本研究描述了一种用于测量人体SACT的新的简单方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验