Vaĭtsekavichius E Iu, Dumchius A S, Navitskas R S, Kastanauskas R I
Kardiologiia. 1983 Jun;23(6):32-7.
Regional analysis was performed in 24 patients with various forms of left ventricular (LV) asynergy. Three quantitative methods of regional analysis with different types of superposition (SP) of end-phasic contours (EPC) were compared: the radial method, taking into account the dislocation of basal structures, was more sensitive (p less than 0.02) in detecting apical asynergy, as compared to the chordal method, or the radial procedure using a different type of SP. The authors used the radial method of regional analysis for estimating LV volumes in 53 patients. The data obtained with this method were in good correlation with those of the conventional "area-length" technique. It is concluded that the radial method taking into account the dislocation of basal structures is useful in complex and quantitative analysis of regional as well as systemic parameters of LV function.
对24例有各种形式左心室(LV)协同失调的患者进行了区域分析。比较了三种采用不同类型的心内膜末期轮廓(EPC)叠加(SP)的区域分析定量方法:考虑到基底结构移位的径向方法,与弦向方法或采用不同类型SP的径向方法相比,在检测心尖协同失调方面更敏感(p<0.02)。作者采用区域分析的径向方法对53例患者的左心室容积进行评估。用该方法获得的数据与传统的“面积-长度”技术的数据具有良好的相关性。结论是,考虑到基底结构移位的径向方法在左心室功能的区域和整体参数的综合定量分析中是有用的。