Blankenhorn D H, Curry P J
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1982 Oct;106(10):483-9.
We reviewed the accuracy of contrast arteriography and ultrasound imaging procedures compared with autopsy findings. We propose that measurement of change in atherosclerotic lesions may substitute for mortality and morbidity of ischemic heart disease in clinical trials. Requirements of accuracy and precision for this application are more demanding than current clinical needs and are set by expected change rates of atherosclerotic lesions. Twelve studies that compared selective coronary arteriography with autopsy showed that arteriography generally underestimated the severity of atherosclerosis. Ultrasound B-mode, Doppler, and duplex images were compared with angiography in 21 studies, but have not been adequately calibrated at autopsy. We recommend that additional calibration of both imaging procedures against autopsy results be performed and be keyed to projected clinical applications.
我们回顾了与尸检结果相比,对比动脉造影和超声成像检查的准确性。我们建议在临床试验中,测量动脉粥样硬化病变的变化可替代缺血性心脏病的死亡率和发病率。此应用对准确性和精确性的要求比当前临床需求更高,由动脉粥样硬化病变的预期变化率决定。12项将选择性冠状动脉造影与尸检进行对比的研究表明,动脉造影通常会低估动脉粥样硬化的严重程度。21项研究将超声B型、多普勒和双功图像与血管造影进行了比较,但尚未在尸检中进行充分校准。我们建议针对尸检结果对这两种成像检查进行额外校准,并根据预计的临床应用进行调整。