• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[盐酸吗啡硬膜外术后镇痛与喷他佐辛术后镇痛效果比较的研究]

[Studies on comparison of the postoperative analgesic method between epidural morphine hydrochloride and pentazocine].

作者信息

Mori T

出版信息

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Nov;34(11):1819-26.

PMID:6897414
Abstract

To investigate effects of epidural morphine and pentazocine on postoperative pain, eighty-eight women who have undergone gynecological abdominal surgery were studied. 1) As for onset of analgesia, there was statistically no significant difference between morphine and pentazocine. 2) The duration of analgesic effect of epidural morphine significantly lasted longer than epidural pentazocine. The duration of analgesic effect of epidural morphine showed a tendency to be longer in the groups of morphine 4 or 6mg than 2mg, but there was no significant difference between the groups of morphine 4 and 6mg. 3) On the postoperative first discharge of bowel gas, there was statistically no significant difference between morphine and pentazocine. The onset time of the gas discharge showed a tendency to be longer in the groups of morphine 4 or 6mg than 2mg. In case of pentazocine, it may be longer in 15mg than 10mg. 4) As for side effects, nausea, vomiting, thirsty, redness of the face and sweating were mainly observed. However, respiratory depression as well as sensory and motor disturbance which frequently observed after epidural injections of the local anesthetic were not recognized in these procedures. But circulatory depression and urinary retention were observed in only one cases of epidural morphine.

摘要

为研究硬膜外吗啡和喷他佐辛对术后疼痛的影响,对88例行妇科腹部手术的女性进行了研究。1)在镇痛起效方面,吗啡和喷他佐辛之间在统计学上无显著差异。2)硬膜外吗啡的镇痛作用持续时间明显长于硬膜外喷他佐辛。硬膜外吗啡4mg或6mg组的镇痛作用持续时间有长于2mg组的趋势,但吗啡4mg和6mg组之间无显著差异。3)在术后首次排气方面,吗啡和喷他佐辛之间在统计学上无显著差异。排气开始时间在吗啡4mg或6mg组有长于2mg组的趋势。对于喷他佐辛,15mg组可能长于10mg组。4)在副作用方面,主要观察到恶心、呕吐、口渴、面部潮红和出汗。然而,在这些操作中未发现硬膜外注射局部麻醉药后常见的呼吸抑制以及感觉和运动障碍。但仅在1例硬膜外吗啡病例中观察到循环抑制和尿潴留。

相似文献

1
[Studies on comparison of the postoperative analgesic method between epidural morphine hydrochloride and pentazocine].[盐酸吗啡硬膜外术后镇痛与喷他佐辛术后镇痛效果比较的研究]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Nov;34(11):1819-26.
2
[Investigations on epidural morphine. Efficacy, solvent, analgesic supplementation].[硬膜外吗啡的研究。疗效、溶剂、镇痛补充]
Anaesthesist. 1982 Jul;31(7):340-4.
3
Epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief: a comparative study with intramuscular narcotic and intercostal nerve block.硬膜外注射吗啡用于术后镇痛:与肌肉注射麻醉剂及肋间神经阻滞的对比研究。
Anesth Analg. 1982 Feb;61(2):93-8.
4
[Peridural morphine analgesia].[硬膜外吗啡镇痛]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1983 Dec;131(12):88-9.
5
Comparison of intramuscular and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in the grossly obese: influence on postoperative ambulation and pulmonary function.
Anesth Analg. 1984 Jun;63(6):583-92.
6
Epidural opioids for postoperative pain relief following hepatectomy.
Osaka City Med J. 1992 Jun;38(1):67-77.
7
The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia.鞘内注射吗啡用于肝切除术后疼痛缓解:与硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198567.85040.ce.
8
[Postoperative analgesia with epidural morphine after hip operations (author's transl)].髋关节手术后硬膜外注射吗啡的术后镇痛(作者译)
Anaesthesist. 1982 Feb;31(2):87-9.
9
[Appropriate duration of postoperative pain relief by continuous epidural infusion in patients receiving hysterectomy or ovarian tumor resection: comparison of three methods].[子宫切除术或卵巢肿瘤切除术患者连续硬膜外输注术后疼痛缓解的适宜持续时间:三种方法的比较]
Masui. 1999 Mar;48(3):244-50.
10
Epidural catheter analgesia for the management of postoperative pain.硬膜外导管镇痛用于术后疼痛管理。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Apr;162(4):389-404.