Abstract
The importance of differentiating between evaluation (an overview of nursing care) and research (a biopsy of nursing care) is stressed. Evaluations are designed to influence nursing care; research is not. In evaluations, feedback is ongoing and dynamic; in research, variables are controlled for change. Magnitude of occurrence and amenability should determine priority of problem selection.
摘要
强调了区分评估（护理照护的概述）和研究（护理照护的剖析）的重要性。评估旨在影响护理照护；而研究并非如此。在评估中，反馈是持续且动态的；在研究中，变量是为了控制变化而设置的。问题发生的频率和可处理性应决定问题选择的优先级。
相似文献
1
An evaluator's perspective.评估者的视角。
Nurs Res. 1980 Mar-Apr;29(2):74-7.
2
[Interrelated issues in evaluation and evaluation research: an evaluator's perspective].[评估与评估研究中的相关问题：评估者的视角]
Kango Kenkyu. 1982 Winter;15(1):11-7.
3
An evaluator's perspective.评估者的视角。
Nurs Res. 1980 Mar-Apr;29(2):91-2.
4
[Establishing valid and reliable criteria: an evaluator's perspective].[建立有效且可靠的标准：评估者的视角]
Kango Kenkyu. 1982 Winter;15(1):38-41.
5
Evaluation of research-based nursing practice.基于研究的护理实践评估。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;30(3):421-8.
6
[Establishing priorities for evaluation and evaluation research: a nursing perspective].[确定评估及评估研究的优先事项：护理视角]
Kango Kenkyu. 1982 Winter;15(1):77-83.
7
Enhancing the evaluation of nursing care effectiveness.
Can J Nurs Res. 2003 Sep;35(3):26-38.
8
Finding value in nursing care: a framework for quality improvement and clinical evaluation.
Nurs Econ. 1998 May-Jun;16(3):110-6, 131.
9
Contextual variables and assessment of the outcome effects of nursing interventions.情境变量与护理干预结果效应的评估
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1999 Jan-Mar;3(1):4-6.
Zotero 插件