Marmor T R, Morone J A
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Winter;58(1):125-65.
The health planning legislation of 1974, establishing HSAs, represented an important attempt to break recurring patterns of decision making in public choices. One widely heralded strategy for controlling contemporary medical care--consumer involvement through accountability, representation, and participation--is flawed by failure to recognize that political markets are always imbalanced because of unequal interests and disproportionate resources. How can we represent broad, diffuse interests when all the incentives point to domination by a minority of intensely interested producers? Solutions favored at the local level may not best serve the entire nation; they cannot mirror the full spectrum of constituencies. Adjustment of mechanisms both internal to HSAs and external to them are suggested--yet, even so, their mandate reaches beyond possibility of accomplishment.
1974年的卫生规划立法设立了卫生服务账户(HSAs),这是打破公共选择中反复出现的决策模式的一次重要尝试。一种广受赞誉的控制当代医疗保健的策略——通过问责制、代表性和参与来让消费者参与其中——存在缺陷,因为它没有认识到由于利益不平等和资源分配不均,政治市场总是失衡的。当所有激励措施都指向少数利益强烈的生产者的主导地位时,我们如何代表广泛而分散的利益呢?地方层面所青睐的解决方案可能并非最有利于整个国家;它们无法反映所有选民的全貌。建议对卫生服务账户内部和外部的机制进行调整——然而,即便如此,它们的任务超出了能够完成的可能性。