• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Academic espionage: dysfunctional aspects of the publish or perish ethic.

作者信息

Mensah L L

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1982 Nov;7(6):577-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00278.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00278.x
PMID:6924943
Abstract

There are many dysfunctional manifestations relative to the tenure and promotion process. These are disruptive to academic life. Much of this is encouraged by the university because of their publish or perish ethic. Excellence in classroom teaching and success in the field of clinical and human endeavours are not highly valued in deliberations to grant tenure and advancement in academic rank. Research and publications are the major yardsticks upon which a faculty member is judged. This prevailing perspective poses a dilemma for many nursing faculty who have high clinical workloads and have not been socialized for academic survival. The pressures to publish and research can be achieved in a realistic and non-stressful way. Three aspects seem to be particularly relevant to facilitate this achievement; these are: anticipatory planning, balancing the workload, and understanding the interpersonal dimensions of collegiality.

摘要

相似文献

1
Academic espionage: dysfunctional aspects of the publish or perish ethic.
J Adv Nurs. 1982 Nov;7(6):577-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00278.x.
2
Transitioning from clinical practice to academia: university expectations on the tenure track.从临床实践转向学术界:大学对终身教职轨道的期望。
Nurse Educ. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):105-9. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181d95069.
3
Academic tenure in schools of nursing.护理学院的终身教职
J Prof Nurs. 1989 Jan-Feb;5(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(89)80034-1.
4
Faculty advising in nursing education: necessary evil or opportunity for excellence?护理教育中的教师指导:是必要之恶还是卓越的契机?
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2009;6:Article29. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1762. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
5
The first 5 years after the dissertation.博士论文完成后的头5年。
J Prof Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):143-7. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90023-r.
6
Core values and evaluation processes associated with academic tenure.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1107-15. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1107-1115.
7
[SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS: ON HONORS AND GHOSTS].[科学出版物:关于荣誉与幽灵]
Harefuah. 2017 Jun;156(6):365-368.
8
Defining collegiality within the academic setting.
J Nurs Educ. 1996 Sep;35(6):264-7. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19960901-07.
9
Resolving an incident of academic dishonesty: plagiarism.解决学术不诚实事件:抄袭。
Nurse Educ. 1983 Spring;8(1):9-12.
10
Publish or perish: a proposal.不发表就灭亡:一项提议。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):261-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-261.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating a medical education enterprise: leveling the playing fields of medical education vs. medical science research within core missions.创建医学教育事业:在核心使命中平衡医学教育与医学科研的竞争环境。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1377038. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1377038.
2
Assessment of educational criteria in academic promotion: Perspectives of faculty members of medical sciences universities in Iran.医学科学大学学术晋升中教育标准的评估:伊朗医学科学大学教职员工的观点。
J Educ Health Promot. 2014 May 3;3:29. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.131893. eCollection 2014.
3
Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods.
重视健康科学学者在学术界的整合性学术成果和应用性学术成果:推荐方法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2007 May 29;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-5-5.
4
Journal notes.期刊笔记。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1984 Apr;72(2):233-7.