• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法庭证词的心理学方面。

Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony.

作者信息

Loftus E F

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;347:27-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb21252.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb21252.x
PMID:6930909
Abstract

As jurors in a criminal or civil trial listen to testimony, they construct in their minds an "image" of an incident that was never witnessed by them. Many psychological factors influence this mental construction and, consequently, the verdict. Research with experimental jurors has revealed: 1. The images that jurors construct are influenced by the particular words and phrases that are used in the testimony they hear. 2. Jurors tend to be overbelieving of certain types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony. Jurors are particularly responsive to the confidence with which eyewitnesses relate their testimony, rather than to the likelihood that the testimony is accurate. 3. Expert testimony, particularly on the subject of the reliability of eyewitness accounts, can cause jurors to better scrutinize the evidence they hear.

摘要

在刑事或民事审判中,陪审员听取证词时,会在脑海中构建一个他们从未目睹过的事件的“形象”。许多心理因素会影响这种心理构建,进而影响裁决。对参与实验的陪审员进行的研究表明:1. 陪审员构建的形象会受到他们所听到的证词中特定词汇和短语的影响。2. 陪审员往往过度相信某些类型的证据,比如证人证言。陪审员对证人陈述证词时的自信程度反应尤为强烈,而不是对证词准确的可能性。3. 专家证词,尤其是关于证人陈述可靠性的主题,会促使陪审员更好地审查他们所听到的证据。

相似文献

1
Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony.法庭证词的心理学方面。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;347:27-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb21252.x.
2
Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?专家证词能让陪审员对供述证据中的差异更敏感吗?
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Dec;40(6):638-649. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000204. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.面对面交锋:闭路电视技术对儿童目击证人证词及陪审员裁决的影响
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Apr;22(2):165-203. doi: 10.1023/a:1025742119977.
4
Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.仅提供辩护方和对立的目击证人专家对陪审员判断的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Oct;28(5):569-76. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000046434.39181.07.
5
Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?专家证言在儿童证人案件中的作用:其是否能使陪审员更加关注法医访谈质量?
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Apr;35(2):152-64. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9228-2.
6
Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details.法庭上的细微说服力:(一些)小细节的力量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 May;56(5):669-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.5.669.
7
Psychiatrists and the jurors' dilemma.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1978;6(1):1-12.
8
Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.目击证人专家证词的时机、陪审员的认知需求以及案件强度作为审判裁决的决定因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):524-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.524.
9
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据:提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
10
Psychiatric testimony in death penalty litigation.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1977;5(3):287-94.