Oppermann R V
Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38(3):155-61. doi: 10.3109/00016358009004715.
Two series of experiments were performed in order to compare the ability of different cationic antiseptics to inhibit the acid production in plaque. In addition an attempt was made to evaluate the influence of oral retention on the acid-inhibiting properties of these agents. In one series of experiments acid production, following sucrose applications on plaque, was measured in situ prior to and at given time intervals after rinsing with the individual agents. In a second series the effect of eluting the antiseptics retained in the oral cavity by means of 5 consecutive acetic acid (6 mM) rinses was evaluated. The results showed that chlorhexidine (0.5 mM) was more effective than benzalkonium chloride (1 mM) and piperazine (1 mM). Cetylpyridinium chloride (1 mM) was the least effective. Acidic elution markedly reduced the inhibitory effect of single rinses of chlorhexidine (0.5 mM), benzalkonium chloride (1 mM) and the cetylpyridinium chloride (1 mM). This effect was less pronounced with a higher concentration (2.2 mM) of chlorhexidine. The results gave support to the view that retention of an agent in the mouth and in plaque is of significance for its ability to inhibit acid production of dental plaque.
为比较不同阳离子防腐剂抑制菌斑产酸的能力,进行了两组实验。此外,还尝试评估口腔滞留对这些药剂抑酸性能的影响。在一组实验中,在用各药剂冲洗之前及之后的特定时间间隔,原位测量菌斑上涂抹蔗糖后的产酸情况。在第二组实验中,评估了通过连续5次用醋酸(6 mM)冲洗来洗脱口腔中滞留的防腐剂的效果。结果表明,洗必泰(0.5 mM)比苯扎氯铵(1 mM)和哌嗪(1 mM)更有效。十六烷基氯化吡啶(1 mM)效果最差。酸性洗脱显著降低了单次冲洗洗必泰(0.5 mM)、苯扎氯铵(1 mM)和十六烷基氯化吡啶(1 mM)的抑制作用。较高浓度(2.2 mM)的洗必泰的这种作用不太明显。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即药剂在口腔和菌斑中的滞留对其抑制牙菌斑产酸的能力具有重要意义。