Thunthy K H, Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980 Nov;50(5):479-83. doi: 10.1016/s0030-4220(80)80018-1.
This study compared the quality of Kodak RP X-Omat, Kodak Blue Brand, and Kodak periapical films processed in manual tank. Auveloper, P-10, All-Pro, Philips 810, and RP X-Omat processors. Film quality was evaluated in terms of film fog, image contrast, and resolution. For Kodak RP X-Omat and periapical films, automatic processors produced less film fog and were more consistent in fog production than manual tank processor. The difference in fog production between automatic and manual processors was not clinically significant; indeed, it was visuially undetectable. The difference disappeared when Kodak Blue Brand film was used. For Kodak RPX-Omat and Kodak Blue Brand films, at high film densities, the RP X-Omat processor produced films of the highest image contrast. For periapical films, the manual processor produced the highest image contrast. Image contrast at low densities was nearly the same for all processors. For each type of film, resolution was nearly the same for all processors.
本研究比较了在手工冲洗槽中冲洗的柯达RP X-Omat胶片、柯达蓝标胶片和柯达根尖片,以及使用Auveloper、P-10、All-Pro、飞利浦810和RP X-Omat冲洗机冲洗的上述胶片的质量。胶片质量通过胶片灰雾、图像对比度和分辨率进行评估。对于柯达RP X-Omat胶片和根尖片,自动冲洗机产生的胶片灰雾较少,且在灰雾产生方面比手工冲洗槽更稳定。自动冲洗机和手工冲洗机在灰雾产生上的差异在临床上不显著;实际上,肉眼无法察觉。使用柯达蓝标胶片时,这种差异消失了。对于柯达RPX-Omat胶片和柯达蓝标胶片,在高胶片密度下,RP X-Omat冲洗机冲洗出的胶片具有最高的图像对比度。对于根尖片,手工冲洗机产生的图像对比度最高。所有冲洗机在低密度下的图像对比度几乎相同。对于每种类型的胶片,所有冲洗机的分辨率几乎相同。