Suppr超能文献

呼吸辅助设备在地方性医院获得性肺炎中的作用。

Role of respiratory assistance devices in endemic nosocomial pneumonia.

作者信息

Cross A S, Roup B

出版信息

Am J Med. 1981 Mar;70(3):681-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90596-9.

Abstract

The role of respiratory assistance devices and techniques in the acquisition of endemic hospital-associated pneumonia was prospectively studied in 13,086 patients over 11 months. Of these, 914 (7 percent) had a respiratory assistance device for at least 24 hours. Cultures of respirator effluent air and nebulizer fluid (taken after 24 hours), tracheostomy sites and irrigating solutions and respirometers were obtained in the 144 of 914 patients who had a respiratory assistance device for at least 72 hours. There were 108 episodes of hospital-associated pneumonia in 107 patients (0.82 percent incidence). Gram-negative organisms were associated with 70 percent of these episodes and Strep. pneumoniae with 5 percent. The risk of hospital-associated pneumonia was 0.3 percent in patients without a respiratory assistance device (35 percent of total hospital-associated pneumonia) versus (1.3 percent with endotracheal tubes and respirators (11 percent of hospital-associated pneumonia), 25 percent with tracheostomy (12 percent of hospital-associated pneumonia) and 66 percent in patients with tracheostomy and a respirator (9 percent of hospital-associated pneumonia). No case of hospital-associated pneumonia occurred in patients on respirators less than 24 hours, but the risk of hospital-associated pneumonia increased significantly after the fifth day of therapy. None of the 63 cultures of nebulizer fluid was positive. Although positive cultures of respiratory effluent, tracheal suction fluid or respirometer were not predictive of the acquisition of hospital-associated pneumonia, nine of 107 patients acquired this infection after a previously positive culture of a respiratory assistance device, and in five instances with the same organism. Since contaminated respiratory assistance devices are rarely a direct cause of hospital-associated pneumonia, routine in-use monitoring of respiratory assistance devices does not appear warranted.

摘要

在11个月的时间里,对13086例患者进行了前瞻性研究,以探讨呼吸辅助设备和技术在获得性医院相关性肺炎中的作用。其中,914例(7%)使用呼吸辅助设备至少24小时。在914例使用呼吸辅助设备至少72小时的患者中,对其中144例患者的呼吸机排出气体、雾化液(24小时后采集)、气管造口部位、冲洗液和呼吸计进行了培养。107例患者发生了108次医院相关性肺炎发作(发病率为0.82%)。革兰氏阴性菌与70%的发作相关,肺炎链球菌与5%的发作相关。未使用呼吸辅助设备的患者发生医院相关性肺炎的风险为0.3%(占医院相关性肺炎总数的35%),而使用气管内插管和呼吸机的患者为1.3%(占医院相关性肺炎的11%),气管造口患者为2.5%(占医院相关性肺炎的12%),气管造口并使用呼吸机的患者为6.6%(占医院相关性肺炎的9%)。使用呼吸机少于24小时的患者未发生医院相关性肺炎,但治疗第五天后医院相关性肺炎的风险显著增加。63份雾化液培养均为阴性。虽然呼吸排出物、气管吸引液或呼吸计的阳性培养不能预测医院相关性肺炎的获得,但107例患者中有9例在呼吸辅助设备培养先前呈阳性后发生了这种感染,其中5例感染的是同一微生物。由于受污染的呼吸辅助设备很少是医院相关性肺炎的直接原因,因此似乎没有必要对呼吸辅助设备进行常规使用监测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验