Koepke J A
Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;68(1 Suppl):202-6.
Performance criteria for manual differential leukocyte counting are tentatively set following analysis of the CAP interlaboratory survey programs in hematology. It is evident that intermediate levels of discrimination of five normal leukocyte types (neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes) can be achieved by almost all laboratories. The most sophisticated level (differentiating band from segmented neutrophils and reactive from normal lymphocytes) is still somewhat controversial. Sampling and other variables when doing 100-cell differential counts at the intermediate level of discrimination are quite predictable, and CAP Survey results closely parallel the predicted results when uniform wedge of centrifuged smears stained in an acceptable manner are used. Automated differential counters should be expected to perform at a level of discrimination at least as good as that of human examiners.
在对美国病理学家学会(CAP)血液学实验室间调查项目进行分析之后,初步设定了手工白细胞分类计数的性能标准。显然,几乎所有实验室都能够实现对五种正常白细胞类型(中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞)的中等水平鉴别。而最复杂的水平(区分带状核与分叶核中性粒细胞以及反应性淋巴细胞与正常淋巴细胞)仍存在一定争议。在中等鉴别水平下进行100个细胞的分类计数时,抽样及其他变量是相当可预测的,并且当使用以可接受方式染色的离心涂片均匀楔形样本时,CAP调查结果与预测结果非常接近。自动血细胞分类仪的鉴别水平应至少与人工检查者相当。