Eickhoff J H, Kjaer L, Siggaard-Andersen J
Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1980;502:15-20.
Blood flow measurements using either a strain gauge plethysmograph or the Dohn air-filled plethysmograph were compared by means of successive measurements in the calf in six normal subjects (12 extremities) and in five patients with arterial insufficiency (nine extremities). Flows were recorded during rest as well as after 5 minutes of ischemia. The strain-gauge plethysmograph tended to give lower values than the Dohn plethysmograph, although at higher flow rates the results were identical. It is concluded that, for most purposes, the Dohn plethysmograph can be replaced by the strain gauge plethysmograph, which is considerably simpler to use.
在六名正常受试者（12个肢体）和五名患有动脉供血不足的患者（9个肢体）的小腿中，通过连续测量，比较了使用应变片体积描记器或多恩空气填充体积描记器进行的血流测量。在休息时以及缺血5分钟后记录血流量。应变片体积描记器测得的值往往低于多恩体积描记器，不过在较高流速下结果是相同的。得出的结论是，在大多数情况下，多恩体积描记器可以被应变片体积描记器取代，因为应变片体积描记器使用起来要简单得多。
