Glavind L, Zeuner E, Attström R
J Clin Periodontol. 1981 Jun;8(3):165-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1981.tb02028.x.
The need for improved oral cleanliness in adults presents a large scale resource requirement for professional manpower if oral hygiene instruction is to be accomplished conventionally on an individual basis at the chairside. Therefore a self-instructional manual in oral hygiene measures, to be used by the patients at home, has been designed. The effect on oral hygiene of periodontal patients following instruction by means of this manual has been compared with the effect of one instruction carried out by a dental hygienist as well as with the effect of minimal instruction by the aid of a short brochure. Thirty-seven patients (25--64 years of age) were allocated to three groups matched with regard to baseline scores of dento-gingival plaque, age and sex. Presence of disclosed dento-gingival plaque (Plak-lite) and gingival bleeding on probing were recorded at the start, 1, 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Toothbrushing performance of the patients was evaluated at each visit by a "brushing test". The treatment of all the patients consisted of scaling and polishing of the teeth at the start and after 3 months as well as the patients being supplied with the necessary oral hygiene aids including a lighted mouth mirror, a toothbrush, toothpicks and disclosing tablets. The baseline mean plaque and bleeding scores of 64 and 40% decreased during the first 6 weeks to a level of 20 and 14%. This improvement was maintained during the 6-month study period. Among the three groups no significant differences were observed in oral hygiene and gingival health. The results indicate that an oral hygiene instructional mode relatively independent of professional manpower may be equally effective as one single personal instruction. Furthermore the results suggest that factors other than the instruction per se are important for obtaining improvements in oral home care.
如果要按照传统方式在椅旁对成年人进行口腔卫生指导,那么提高成年人的口腔清洁度就需要大量的专业人力资源。因此,设计了一本供患者在家中使用的口腔卫生措施自我指导手册。将通过该手册进行指导后对牙周病患者口腔卫生的影响,与牙科保健员进行一次指导的效果以及借助简短手册进行最少指导的效果进行了比较。37名患者(年龄在25至64岁之间)被分为三组,在牙菌斑、年龄和性别方面的基线得分相匹配。在开始时、第1、2和6周、3和6个月时记录已暴露的牙菌斑(Plak-lite)的存在情况以及探诊时牙龈出血情况。每次就诊时通过“刷牙测试”评估患者的刷牙表现。所有患者的治疗包括在开始时和3个月后进行洗牙和牙齿抛光,以及为患者提供必要的口腔卫生辅助工具,包括带灯口腔镜、牙刷、牙签和菌斑显示片。在前6周内,基线平均菌斑和出血得分分别从64%和40%降至20%和14%。在6个月的研究期间,这种改善得以维持。在三组之间,在口腔卫生和牙龈健康方面未观察到显著差异。结果表明,一种相对独立于专业人力的口腔卫生指导模式可能与单次个人指导同样有效。此外,结果表明,除指导本身外的其他因素对于改善家庭口腔护理很重要。