用于检测粪便中血液存在的五种愈创木脂试纸试验的比较。

Comparison of five guaiac resin paper tests for demonstrating the presence of blood in faeces.

作者信息

Frommer D, Logue T

出版信息

Aust N Z J Med. 1981 Oct;11(5):494-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1981.tb04617.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.1981.tb04617.x

Abstract

Four recently available kits of guaiac resin-impregnated paper for demonstrating the presence of blood in faeces were compared with Hemoccult II in in vitro testing. Hemo-FEC most closely resembled Hemoccult II in its sensitivity with freshly prepared kits and kits prepared one week earlier with or without rehydration before testing. Gamma Fe-Cult and Fecatest were more sensitive than Hemoccult II whereas Camco-Pac Guaiac was much less sensitive. Rehydration of kits prepared several days beforehand appears to be useful in restoring sensitivity lost by all the kits tested.

摘要

将四种最近可得的用于检测粪便中血液的愈创木脂浸渍纸试剂盒与便潜血检测试剂Ⅱ（Hemoccult II）进行了体外测试比较。就新制备的试剂盒以及提前一周制备的试剂盒（测试前有无复水）而言，Hemo - FEC在灵敏度方面与便潜血检测试剂Ⅱ最为相似。伽马铁培养法（Gamma Fe - Cult）和粪便检测法（Fecatest）比便潜血检测试剂Ⅱ更灵敏，而Camco - Pac愈创木脂试剂盒的灵敏度则低得多。提前几天制备的试剂盒进行复水似乎有助于恢复所有测试试剂盒所丧失的灵敏度。