Broström L A, Strander H, Nilsonne U
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Jul(167):250-4.
To evaluate the outcome for osteosarcoma patients treated with different forms of adjuvant therapy in nonrandomized series, it is important to realize the possible influence of different prognostic factors. In two series of patients with primary classic osteosarcoma, survival was analyzed in relation to tumor size and site. In the first series comprising 57 patients, no adjuvant therapy was given and the five-year survival rate for all patients was 19%. A significantly (p less than 0.01) higher survival rate (43%) was noted for patients with tumors distally located and less than 0 cm in size (as measured by their largest diameter on radiograms), as compared to 12% for patients with larger and proximally located tumors. These figures were the same at three-and five-year follow-up. In the second series, comprising 22 patients, all received adjuvant interferon treatment. The three-year survival rate was 68%, and the five-year survival rate for the 12 patients followed was 58%. The survival rate for patients with tumors distally located and less than 10 cm in size was 88%, as compared to 57% for patients with larger and proximally located tumors. In the interferon series, tumor size appeared more important than location.
为了评估在非随机系列研究中接受不同形式辅助治疗的骨肉瘤患者的治疗结果,认识到不同预后因素的可能影响很重要。在两组原发性经典骨肉瘤患者中,分析了生存率与肿瘤大小和部位的关系。在第一组57例患者中,未给予辅助治疗,所有患者的五年生存率为19%。与肿瘤较大且位于近端的患者的12%相比,肿瘤位于远端且大小小于5cm(通过X线片上的最大直径测量)的患者的生存率显著更高(43%,p<0.01)。在三年和五年随访时这些数字相同。在第二组22例患者中,所有患者均接受辅助干扰素治疗。三年生存率为68%,随访的12例患者的五年生存率为58%。肿瘤位于远端且大小小于10cm的患者的生存率为88%,而肿瘤较大且位于近端的患者的生存率为57%。在干扰素治疗组中,肿瘤大小似乎比部位更重要。