Reiffers J, Dachary D, Bernard P, Veyret V, Boisseau M R, Broustet A
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978). 1982;24(4):237-40.
Blood and bone marrow samples from 106 patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia were reviewed independently by three observers according to the FAB proposals. Without a cytochemical stain, complete agreement occurred in 75% of cases. The major discrepancies were between M1 and M5 poorly differentiated (4 cases) and M2 and M4 (12 cases). These discrepancies disappeared with cytochemistry. Others non-concurrences were between M1 and M2 (4 cases) M2 and M6 (3 cases), M4 and M5 differentiated (2 cases), M2 and RAEB (1 case). To solve these latter discrepancies some points of the FAB classification require clarification.
106例急性髓细胞白血病患者的血液和骨髓样本由三名观察者根据FAB标准独立进行检查。在不进行细胞化学染色的情况下,75%的病例诊断完全一致。主要差异存在于M1与低分化M5(4例)以及M2与M4(12例)之间。这些差异在进行细胞化学染色后消失。其他不一致的情况存在于M1与M2(4例)、M2与M6(3例)、分化型M4与M5(2例)、M2与RAEB(1例)之间。为解决这些后期差异,FAB分类的一些要点需要进一步明确。