Latham L L
Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Sep;83(2):145-55.
The performance of retarded subjects on five short-term memory tasks was analyzed in order to determine whether these tasks possessed construct and ecological validity. I predicted that certain components of each task required an active strategic process for optimal performance, whereas other components would only require a passive process. A principal axes factor analysis was performed on the intercorrelations of these components, and three factors were isolated that accounted for performance on the five tasks. Two of these factors were viewed as representing active and passive processes, and the third factor was determined by a recognition-memory task and, apparently, did not require the same processes as the recall tasks. These findings indicated that some of the short-term memory tasks possessed construct validity. An additional analysis was the investigation of the ecological validity of the various short-term memory tasks. Several multiple-correlation coefficients between memory scores and measures of adaptive behavior were significant and support the interpretation that the measures of short-term memory are ecologically valid.
为了确定五项短期记忆任务是否具有结构效度和生态效度,对智力发育迟缓受试者在这些任务上的表现进行了分析。我预测,每项任务的某些组成部分需要积极的策略性过程才能达到最佳表现,而其他组成部分则只需要被动过程。对这些组成部分的相互关联进行了主成分因子分析,分离出三个因素,它们解释了五项任务的表现。其中两个因素被视为代表主动和被动过程,第三个因素由一项再认记忆任务决定,显然,它不需要与回忆任务相同的过程。这些发现表明,一些短期记忆任务具有结构效度。另一项分析是对各种短期记忆任务的生态效度进行调查。记忆分数与适应性行为测量之间的几个多重相关系数具有显著性,支持了短期记忆测量具有生态效度的解释。