Lange J E, Morey J A, Richards O W
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Jun;57(6):400-3. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198006000-00014.
Thirty-one normal and 20 color vision-deficient persons were tested with the Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) Pseudoisochromatic Plates, Farnsworth's D-15 and 100-Hue tests, and the Davidson & Hemmendinger (D & H) Color Rule using Vita-Lite, Ultralume, and Cool White fluorescent lamps to determine their usefulness for color vision measurement. The persons with deficient color vision were classified with a Nagel anomaloscope. The Macbeth Easel lamp was the reference for determining relative lamp performance. No normal was misclassified with any of the lamps. Scores with the Vita-Lite lamp were qualitatively and quantitatively most similar to those with the Macbeth lamp. The Ultralume gave intermediate results, and the Cool White was the least satisfactory substitute. Norms for the metameric D & H Color Rule for each lamp were different, which prevented intercomparisons. Best separation of the scores of deficient from normal persons with the D & H Rule occurred with the Macbeth and Vita-Lite lamps. Better performance with the Vita-Lite and Ultralume lamps can be expected from protans with the HRR and 100-Hue Tests and poorer performances from deutans on the HRR tests than with the standard Macbeth Lamp. The Cool White lamp was judged an unsuitable substitute for color vision testing.
使用Vita-Lite、Ultralume和冷白色荧光灯，对31名正常人和20名色觉缺陷者进行了哈迪-兰德-里特勒（HRR）假同色图、法恩斯沃思D-15和100色调测试以及戴维森和亨门丁格（D&H）颜色规则测试，以确定它们在色觉测量中的实用性。色觉缺陷者用纳格尔色盲检查镜进行分类。麦克白画架灯是确定相对灯性能的参考标准。没有正常人被任何一种灯误分类。Vita-Lite灯的得分在定性和定量上与麦克白灯的得分最相似。Ultralume给出的结果居中，冷白色是最不令人满意的替代品。每种灯的同色异谱D&H颜色规则的标准不同，这使得无法进行相互比较。使用D&H规则时，麦克白灯和Vita-Lite灯能最好地将色觉缺陷者与正常人的得分区分开来。预计在HRR和100色调测试中，Vita-Lite灯和Ultralume灯对红色盲者的表现更好，而在HRR测试中，绿色盲者的表现比使用标准麦克白灯时更差。冷白色荧光灯被判定为不适合用于色觉测试。
