Suppr超能文献

《退休历史研究》中受访者的强制退休与劳动力参与情况

Mandatory retirement and labor-force participation of respondents in the Retirement History Study.

作者信息

Barker D T, Clark R L

出版信息

Soc Secur Bull. 1980 Nov;43(11):20-9, 55.

PMID:6969939
Abstract

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) was amended in 1978 to prohibit mandatory retirement before age 70 in most occupations. The impact of this legislation on the probability of older persons remaining in the labor force is the primary concern of this article. Specifically, questions concerning which older workers are affected by mandatory-retirement provisions and the extent to which they are forced to retire and leave the labor force are examined. Tabular analysis of data from the Retirement History Study on persons aged 62-63 in 1969 shows significant variation in mandatory-retirement coverage between the public and private sectors and across industries, occupations, and demographic groups. Until age 65, the labor-force participation rate of those facing compulsory retirement is higher than or equal to that of those not covered but it drops significantly below the noncovered rate after 65. Logit analysis of the labor-force participation of persons before and after age 65 indicates that mandatory retirement at that age reduces the probability of retirement by approximately 16.7 percentage points for white men wage earners. This results in a decline in the labor-force participation rate of all men aged 66-67 of approximately 4 percentage points.

摘要

《就业年龄歧视法》(ADEA)于1978年修订,禁止在大多数职业中强制70岁之前退休。本文主要关注这项立法对老年人留在劳动力队伍中的可能性的影响。具体而言,研究了哪些老年工人受到强制退休规定的影响以及他们被迫退休并离开劳动力队伍的程度等问题。对1969年62 - 63岁人群的退休历史研究数据进行表格分析表明,公共部门和私营部门以及不同行业、职业和人口群体之间的强制退休覆盖率存在显著差异。在65岁之前,面临强制退休的人的劳动力参与率高于或等于未受此规定影响的人,但在65岁之后,该参与率大幅降至未受影响者的比率之下。对65岁前后人群的劳动力参与情况进行逻辑回归分析表明,该年龄的强制退休使白人男性工薪族的退休概率降低了约16.7个百分点。这导致所有66 - 67岁男性的劳动力参与率下降了约4个百分点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验