Fankhauser S, Laube W, Marti H R, Schultheiss H R, Vögtlin J, von Graffenried B
Arzneimittelforschung. 1981;31(5a):934-5.
A multicentric, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was performed in patients with fever of diverse origin to test the tolerance and the antipyretic activity of single oral doses of 4-(p-fluorophenyl)-1-isopropyl-7-methyl-2(1H)-quinazolinone (fluproquazone) (200 mg, n = 18), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (1000 mg, n = 22) and placebo (n = 19). Whereas with placebo mean rectal temperature remained constant, a continuous fall was recorded with both active medications over the whole 3-h study period. With fluproquazone normalization of body temperature was nearly reached. Fluproquazone was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.001) and ASA (p less than 0.1), which in turn was more active than placebo (p less than 0.0001). No specific side-effects occurred.
对多种原因引起发热的患者进行了一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究,以测试单次口服4-(对氟苯基)-1-异丙基-7-甲基-2(1H)-喹唑啉酮(氟丙喹宗)(200毫克,n = 18)、乙酰水杨酸(ASA)(1000毫克,n = 22)和安慰剂(n = 19)的耐受性和退热活性。安慰剂组直肠平均体温保持不变,而两种活性药物在整个3小时研究期间均记录到体温持续下降。使用氟丙喹宗时体温几乎恢复正常。氟丙喹宗比安慰剂更有效(p < 0.001),且比ASA更有效(p < 0.1),而ASA又比安慰剂更具活性(p < 0.0001)。未出现特定副作用。