Füst G, Fekete B, Angyal I, Jakab A, Pál A, Merétey K, Falus A, Török K, Szegedi G, Kávai M, Puskás E, Csécsi-Nagy M, Szabó T, Lenkey A, Misz M
J Immunol Methods. 1981;46(3):259-76. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(81)90311-2.
In a collaborative study involving 7 laboratories, sera from 53 patients with lung cancer, 37 primary and 16 secondary tumours, and sera of 40 healthy blood donors were tested by 19 different assays or assay modifications used for detecting immune complexes. In 12 out of 19 assays, significantly higher immune complex levels were found in the cancer patients than in the healthy subjects. Assays based on interactions between immune complexes and Fc receptors of different cells (lymphocytes, macrophages of platelets) discriminated between cancer patients and health subjects and a high percentage (47-87%) of positivity was observed in such assays in patients with lung cancer. In contrast, none of the tests based on immune complex-complement interactions discriminated between cancer patients and health subjects. Immunochemical analyses of the PEG precipitates obtained from the sera tested revealed that the concentrations of IgG, IgA and C3 were significantly higher in the precipitates obtained from patients sera than from control sera, but no significant differences were seen in IgM and C1q concentrations. A 100% correct classification of individuals tested was obtained on discriminant analysis of results with 3 assays: EA rosette inhibition, ADCC inhibition and C3 concentration in PEG precipitates. Correlation between results obtained with individual sera by the different assays was very poor: significant correlation coefficients were found in only 13% of all possible paired comparisons. Our results suggest that Fc receptor-dependent assays are more suitable for detection and measurement of circulating immune complexes in lung cancer than tests based on interactions with complement.
在一项由7个实验室参与的合作研究中,对53例肺癌患者(37例原发性肿瘤和16例继发性肿瘤)的血清以及40名健康献血者的血清,采用19种不同的检测方法或检测方法的改良形式来检测免疫复合物。在19种检测方法中的12种里,发现癌症患者的免疫复合物水平显著高于健康受试者。基于免疫复合物与不同细胞(淋巴细胞、血小板巨噬细胞)的Fc受体之间相互作用的检测方法能够区分癌症患者和健康受试者,并且在肺癌患者的此类检测中观察到较高的阳性率(47%-87%)。相比之下,基于免疫复合物-补体相互作用的检测方法均无法区分癌症患者和健康受试者。对检测血清中获得的聚乙二醇沉淀物进行免疫化学分析显示,从患者血清中获得的沉淀物中IgG、IgA和C3的浓度显著高于对照血清,但IgM和C1q浓度未见显著差异。通过对EA花环抑制、ADCC抑制和聚乙二醇沉淀物中C3浓度这3种检测结果进行判别分析,对所检测的个体实现了100%的正确分类。不同检测方法对个体血清检测结果之间的相关性非常低:在所有可能的配对比较中,仅13%发现了显著的相关系数。我们的结果表明,与基于补体相互作用的检测方法相比,依赖Fc受体的检测方法更适合于检测和测量肺癌患者循环免疫复合物。