Froese A, Helm R M, Conrad D H, Isersky C, Ishizaka T, Kulczycki A
Immunology. 1982 May;46(1):107-16.
REceptors for IgE of rat basophilic leukaemia (RBL) cells, maintained in different laboratories were isolated by means of IgE-Sepharose or IgE and anti-IgE, and characterized by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. All cell lines were found to be associated with a receptor molecule (R) which could be isolated either with IgE-Sepharose or IgE and anti-IgE and a second receptor (H) which could only be isolated with the aid of IgE-Sepharose. The relative amounts of these two molecules, as isolated from surface iodinated cells, varied from the RBL cell line to the other and their apparent molecular weights were not identical on all cell lines. Since comparisons were made on the same gel using receptors isolated from cells labelled with different isotopes of iodine, differences in molecular weight must be considered as being intrinsic and not due to methodological variations. These results provide an explanation why differences were observed among receptors for IgE as characterized in various laboratories. In spite of the fact that the various RBL cell lines originated from the same chemically-induced tumour they have, over the years, undergone changes which are reflected in the receptors for IgE.
在不同实验室培养的大鼠嗜碱性白血病(RBL)细胞的IgE受体,通过IgE-琼脂糖凝胶或IgE与抗IgE进行分离,并通过SDS-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳进行表征。发现所有细胞系都与一种受体分子(R)相关,该分子可以用IgE-琼脂糖凝胶或IgE与抗IgE分离,还有一种第二受体(H),只能借助IgE-琼脂糖凝胶分离。从表面碘化细胞中分离出的这两种分子的相对量因RBL细胞系而异,并且它们在所有细胞系上的表观分子量也不相同。由于使用从用不同碘同位素标记的细胞中分离出的受体在同一凝胶上进行比较,分子量的差异必须被视为内在的,而不是由于方法学的变化。这些结果解释了为什么在不同实验室表征的IgE受体之间会观察到差异。尽管各种RBL细胞系源自同一化学诱导的肿瘤,但多年来它们已经发生了变化,这在IgE受体中得到了体现。