Reiling R B, Reiling W A, Bernie W A, Huffer A B, Perkins N C, Elliott D W
Am J Surg. 1980 Jan;139(1):147-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90244-5.
A controlled prospective study was carried out in a university-affiliated community hospital to evaluate the use of gastrointestinal staples compared with conventional sutures for anastomotic construction. The study included 100 randomized cases (50 sutured and 50 stapled) requiring anastomoses. Consecutive patients were accepted into the study, and no patients were excluded. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operating room time or the duration of postoperative hospitalization, nasogastric intubation or intravenous intubation. The complication rate was similar and comparable to previously published results. On three occasions, it was necessary during operation to convert from the use of staples to sutures when immediate disruption was noted at a gastroduodenal anastomosis.
在一家大学附属医院的社区医院进行了一项对照前瞻性研究,以评估与传统缝合相比,胃肠吻合钉在吻合口构建中的应用。该研究纳入了100例需要进行吻合术的随机病例(50例采用缝合,50例采用吻合钉)。连续病例被纳入研究,无患者被排除。两组在手术时间、术后住院时间、鼻胃管插管或静脉插管方面无显著差异。并发症发生率相似,与先前发表的结果相当。有三次,在胃十二指肠吻合术中发现立即破裂时,术中需要从使用吻合钉改为缝合。