Eisenberg M S, Bergner L, Hearne T
Am J Public Health. 1980 Mar;70(3):236-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.3.236.
The scientific literature from January 1970 to June 1979 was reviewed for articles reporting outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by paramedic programs. Only articles appearing in refereed professional journals and reporting 25 or more attempted resuscitations were included. A total of 21 articles from 15 U.S. locations were found. Four separate case definitions were distinguished. Methods and reporting formats varied considerably. Few studies used an experimental or quasi-experimental design, or control or comparison groups. The range of attempted resuscitations varied from 26 to 1.106 patients. Patients admitted to hospital varied between 22 per cent and 65 per cent (mean 38 per cent, S.D. +/- 12.4 per cent). Patients discharged alive varied from 3.5 per cent to 31 per cent (mean 17.2 per cent, S.D. +/- 7.1 per cent). Post discharge survival was either not reported or reported in different formats. A simplified reporting format is proposed using factors known to be associated with successful resuscitation: 1) underlying heart disease etiology; 2) witnessed arrest; 3) cardiac rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia; 4) hospital admission and discharge and, when possible, by time from collapse to initiation of CPR and definitive care. Uniform reporting of outcomes will improve comparability and accurate measurement of the impact of emergency programs on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
对1970年1月至1979年6月的科学文献进行了回顾,以查找有关护理人员项目治疗院外心脏骤停结果的文章。仅纳入发表在经同行评审的专业期刊上且报告了25例或更多复苏尝试的文章。共找到来自美国15个地点的21篇文章。区分了四种不同的病例定义。方法和报告格式差异很大。很少有研究采用实验性或准实验性设计,或使用对照组或比较组。复苏尝试的范围从26例到1106例患者不等。入院患者比例在22%至65%之间(平均38%,标准差±12.4%)。存活出院的患者比例从3.5%至31%不等(平均17.2%,标准差±7.1%)。出院后的生存情况要么未报告,要么以不同格式报告。建议采用一种简化的报告格式,使用已知与成功复苏相关的因素:1)潜在心脏病病因;2)目击骤停;3)室颤/室性心动过速的心律;4)入院和出院情况,以及在可能的情况下,从心脏骤停到开始心肺复苏和确定性治疗的时间。结果的统一报告将提高可比性,并准确衡量急救项目对院外心脏骤停的影响。