Suppr超能文献

超觉静坐者与非超觉静坐者的生理焦虑反应。

Physiological anxiety responses in transcendental meditators and nonmeditators.

作者信息

Lintel A G

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1980 Feb;50(1):295-300. doi: 10.2466/pms.1980.50.1.295.

Abstract

In Exp. I, the spontaneous GSR of seven Transcendental Meditators and seven nonmeditators was measured in a sequence of five conditions: stress (shock avoidance)--rest--meditation (meditators) or rest/eyes closed (nonmeditators)--stress (shock avoidance)--rest. In Exp. II, the spontaneous GSR of a similar group of subjects was measured in a sequence of three conditions: rest--meditation or rest/eyes closed--rest. Analysis of variance did not yield significant differences between meditators and nonmeditators although analysis did verify that the shock-avoidance task effectively produced anxiety. It was concluded that Transcendental Meditation is not an effective means of reducing autonomic responses to stress under the present testing conditions.

摘要

在实验一中,对七名超觉静坐者和七名非静坐者的自发皮肤电反应(GSR)在以下五个条件序列中进行了测量:压力(避免电击)——休息——冥想(静坐者)或闭眼休息(非静坐者)——压力(避免电击)——休息。在实验二中,对一组类似的受试者的自发皮肤电反应在以下三个条件序列中进行了测量:休息——冥想或闭眼休息——休息。方差分析未得出静坐者和非静坐者之间的显著差异,尽管分析确实证实了避免电击任务有效地引发了焦虑。得出的结论是,在当前测试条件下,超觉静坐不是减轻对压力的自主反应的有效手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验