Camplejohn R S
Cell Tissue Kinet. 1980 May;13(3):327-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1980.tb00471.x.
Vincristine (VCR) has been used clinically in so-called 'tumour cell synchronization therapy schedules'. These schedules are based on the assumption that cells, arrested in metaphase by low doses of VCR, subsequently re-enter the proliferative cycle synchronously. However, the evidence that tumour cell synchrony can be achieved under clinical conditions or that 'cell synchronization therapy schedules' yield a better therapeutic response than other efficient combination schemes, is scanty. Further, even in experimental systems, the efficacy of VCR as a cell synchronizing agent is disputed. Indeed, in some systems, cells arrested in metaphase by low doses of VCR, do not re-enter a normal proliferative cycle at all following arrest. In addition, the complex nature of the VCR-tumour interaction and the heterogeneous nature of the tumour cell populations against which it is used augurs badly for the successful application of cell synchronization therapy schedules.
长春新碱(VCR)已在所谓的“肿瘤细胞同步化治疗方案”中得到临床应用。这些方案基于这样一种假设,即低剂量VCR使细胞停滞在中期后,随后会同步重新进入增殖周期。然而,关于在临床条件下能否实现肿瘤细胞同步化,或者“细胞同步化治疗方案”是否比其他有效联合方案产生更好的治疗反应的证据却很少。此外,即使在实验系统中,VCR作为细胞同步化剂的功效也存在争议。实际上,在一些系统中,低剂量VCR使细胞停滞在中期后,停滞之后根本不会重新进入正常的增殖周期。另外,VCR与肿瘤相互作用的复杂性质以及使用VCR所针对的肿瘤细胞群体的异质性,对于细胞同步化治疗方案的成功应用而言,预示着不利的结果。