Mechanic D, Greenley J R, Cleary P D, Hoeper E W, Wenzel F J
Med Care. 1980 Jun;18(6):597-608. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198006000-00003.
Comparisons of prepaid, Medicaid and fee-for-service patients using the Marshfield Clinic and affiliated non-Clinic physicians indicate that a well-organized multispecialty group can successfully provide accessible and responsive care to rural populations and integrate varying types of payment systems. Most patients were highly satisfied, but differences in satisfaction among varying subgroups were substantially attributable to access barriers. Patients in the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan (prepaied patients) were most generally satisfied, but patients using non-Clinic affiliates were higher on socioemotional satisfaction, reflecting certain barriers to personal care in complex organizational settings.
对使用马什菲尔德诊所及附属非诊所医生的预付制患者、医疗补助患者和按服务收费患者的比较表明,一个组织良好的多专科医疗团队能够成功地为农村人口提供便捷且响应迅速的医疗服务,并整合不同类型的支付系统。大多数患者非常满意,但不同亚组之间的满意度差异很大程度上归因于就医障碍。大马什菲尔德社区健康计划的患者(预付制患者)总体上最满意,但使用非诊所附属机构的患者在社会情感满意度方面更高,这反映了在复杂组织环境中个人护理存在的某些障碍。