Carlon G C, Howland W S, Turnbull A D, Kahn R C
Crit Care Med. 1980 Nov;8(11):616-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198011000-00004.
Many authors have indicated that high FIO2 (0.75-1.0) ventilation may increase pulmonary venous admixture. Reabsorption atelectasis is supposedly responsible for this adverse effect. The authors attempted to determine if increasing PEEP during high FIO2 ventilation could eliminate the detrimental influence of the latter. In 17 patients in respiratory failure, hemodynamic and respiratory variables were measured during ventilation with FIO2 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 and PEEP varying from -3 to +5 cm H2O from baseline. Before exposure to FIO2 > 0.75, addition of PEEP resulted in a decrease of Qs/Qt from a mean of 26.6-21.9%. After exposure to FIO2 0.75-1.0, Qs/Qt remained at levels not different from baseline, even when PEEP 8 cm H2O above baseline was added. The authors conclude that ventilation with high FIO2 is not useful in determining Qs/Qt, and may prevent the improvement in pulmonary venous admixture associated with PEEP therapy.
许多作者指出,高浓度氧(FIO2 0.75 - 1.0)通气可能会增加肺静脉混合血。再吸收性肺不张被认为是造成这种不良影响的原因。作者试图确定在高浓度氧通气期间增加呼气末正压(PEEP)是否可以消除后者的有害影响。在17例呼吸衰竭患者中,在FIO2分别为0.50、0.75和1.0且PEEP从基线的-3至+5 cm H2O变化的通气过程中,测量血流动力学和呼吸变量。在暴露于FIO2 > 0.75之前,增加PEEP会使分流率(Qs/Qt)从平均26.6%降至21.9%。在暴露于FIO2 0.75 - 1.0之后,即使添加高于基线8 cm H2O的PEEP,Qs/Qt仍维持在与基线无差异的水平。作者得出结论,高浓度氧通气对于确定Qs/Qt并无用处,且可能会阻碍与PEEP治疗相关的肺静脉混合血的改善。