Rizza R A, Gerich J E, Haymond M W, Westland R E, Hall L D, Clemens A H, Service F J
N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 4;303(23):1313-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198012043032301.
We compared the ability of closed-loop intravenous insulin infusion (i.e., an artificial "pancreas"), open-loop continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and intensified conventional insulin therapy (preprandial injections of regular insulin, with injection of long-acting zinc-suspension insulin before breakfast) to bring the hyperglycemia of insulin-dependent diabetic subjects to a level comparable to that of normal, nondiabetic subjects. The mean circadian levels of plasma glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and M values (defined in Methods) did not significantly differ among the three regimens. Although these levels in the diabetic subjects approximated those in the normal subjects, the levels of plasma insulin, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and M values were significantly higher than those in normal subjects (P < 0.01). Therefore, at least on a short-term basis, all three regimens can produce comparable, nearly normal levels of blood sugar in such patients; moreover, closed-loop devices can be used to determine insulin requirements for conventional therapy.
我们比较了闭环静脉胰岛素输注(即人工“胰腺”)、开环持续皮下胰岛素输注和强化常规胰岛素治疗(餐前注射正规胰岛素,早餐前注射长效锌悬液胰岛素)将胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的高血糖水平降至与正常非糖尿病患者相当水平的能力。三种治疗方案的血浆葡萄糖平均昼夜水平、血糖波动平均幅度和M值(方法中定义)无显著差异。虽然糖尿病患者的这些水平接近正常受试者,但血浆胰岛素水平、血糖波动平均幅度和M值显著高于正常受试者(P<0.01)。因此,至少在短期内,所有三种治疗方案都能使此类患者的血糖水平达到可比的、接近正常的水平;此外,闭环装置可用于确定常规治疗的胰岛素需求量。