• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度高血压的治疗:一项为期五年的对照药物试验。奥斯陆研究。

Treatment of mild hypertension: a five year controlled drug trial. The Oslo study.

作者信息

Helgeland A

出版信息

Am J Med. 1980 Nov;69(5):725-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90438-6.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(80)90438-6
PMID:7001898
Abstract

In 1972--1973, 785 symptom-free men, aged 40 to 49 years, without target organ damage, with systolic blood pressures between 150 and 179 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure below 110 mm Hg, were assigned at random to one of two groups: (406 to a drug treatment group and 379 to a control group) for a five-year controlled drug treatment trial to evaluate the effect of therapy on cardiovascular complications. Drug treatment started with hydrochlorothiazide. If systolic blood pressure remained above 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg, alphamethyldopa was added. If there were side effects, methyldopa was replaced with propranolol. The control group was not given a placebo. The mean observation time was 66 months (range 60 to 78 months). A difference in blood pressure between groups of about 17 mm Hg systolic and 10 mm Hg diastolic was maintained throughout the study. The study protocol had a rather low "ethical" blood pressure roof, 180 mm Hg systolic and/or 110 mm Hg diastolic. Seventeen percent of the control group had an increase in blood pressure above this level during the trial, and drug treatment was started. There was no effect on major cardiovascular morbidity comparing groups as established by randomization, with 18 events in the treatment group and 20 events in the control group. There was no difference between the groups in total mortality and mortality from cardiovascular events. However, in the subgroups with diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg before randomization, there was a probable reduction in total morbidity from cardiovascular events in favor or the group receiving drug therapy, 7.6 and 16.4 percent events in the treated and control groups, respectively. Cerebrovascular events occurred only in the control group, 7 versus 0. Two cases of fatal aortic aneurysms also occurred in the control group. Other "pressure" complications, such as marked left ventricular hypertrophy in the electrocardiogram and left ventricular failure, occurred only in the control group. However, regarding coronary heart disease, including sudden death, the incidence tended to be higher in the treated group, although it was not statistically significant. Only 13 men (1.7 percent) failed to meet for regular examinations. At the end of the study these men were also followed up with regard to possible cardiovascular events.

摘要

1972年至1973年期间,785名40至49岁无症状男性,无靶器官损害,收缩压在150至179毫米汞柱之间且舒张压低于110毫米汞柱,被随机分为两组(406人进入药物治疗组,379人进入对照组),进行为期五年的对照药物治疗试验,以评估治疗对心血管并发症的影响。药物治疗从氢氯噻嗪开始。如果收缩压仍高于140毫米汞柱和/或舒张压高于90毫米汞柱,则加用α-甲基多巴。如果出现副作用,则用普萘洛尔替代甲基多巴。对照组未给予安慰剂。平均观察时间为66个月(范围60至78个月)。在整个研究过程中,两组之间收缩压相差约17毫米汞柱,舒张压相差约10毫米汞柱。研究方案设定的“伦理”血压上限相当低,收缩压180毫米汞柱和/或舒张压110毫米汞柱。在试验期间,17%的对照组患者血压升高超过此水平,并开始药物治疗。随机分组确定的两组之间,主要心血管疾病发病率无差异,治疗组有18例事件,对照组有20例事件。两组在总死亡率和心血管事件死亡率方面无差异。然而,在随机分组前舒张压大于或等于100毫米汞柱的亚组中,接受药物治疗组的心血管事件总发病率可能降低,治疗组和对照组的事件发生率分别为7.6%和16.4%。脑血管事件仅发生在对照组,7例对0例。对照组还发生了2例致命性主动脉瘤。其他“压力”并发症,如心电图显示明显左心室肥厚和左心室衰竭,仅发生在对照组。然而,关于冠心病,包括猝死,治疗组的发病率往往较高,尽管无统计学意义。只有13名男性(1.7%)未参加定期检查。在研究结束时,也对这些男性可能发生的心血管事件进行了随访。

相似文献

1
Treatment of mild hypertension: a five year controlled drug trial. The Oslo study.轻度高血压的治疗:一项为期五年的对照药物试验。奥斯陆研究。
Am J Med. 1980 Nov;69(5):725-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90438-6.
2
Coronary heart disease and treatment of hypertension. Some Oslo Study data.冠心病与高血压的治疗。一些奥斯陆研究数据。
Am J Med. 1986 Feb 14;80(2A):3-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90153-1.
3
Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.安慰剂与活性治疗对老年单纯收缩期高血压患者疗效的随机双盲对照研究。欧洲收缩期高血压(Syst-Eur)试验研究者。
Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):757-64. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6.
4
Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients.治疗后高血压患者左心室肥厚消退的时间进程。
Am J Med. 1983 Sep 26;75(3A):100-10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90126-2.
5
Untreated mild hypertension. A report by the Management Committee of the Australian Therapeutic Trial in Mild Hypertension.未经治疗的轻度高血压。澳大利亚轻度高血压治疗试验管理委员会的一份报告。
Lancet. 1982 Jan 23;1(8265):185-91.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
7
Oslo study: treatment of mild hypertension. A five-year controlled drug study.奥斯陆研究:轻度高血压的治疗。一项为期五年的对照药物研究。
Nephron. 1987;47 Suppl 1:108-10. doi: 10.1159/000184565.
8
Serum glucose levels during long-term observation of treated and untreated men with mild hypertension. The Oslo study.轻度高血压男性患者接受治疗和未接受治疗的长期观察期间的血清葡萄糖水平。奥斯陆研究。
Am J Med. 1984 May;76(5):802-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90990-2.
9
Oslo Hypertension Study.奥斯陆高血压研究
Drugs. 1986;31 Suppl 1:41-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600311-00008.
10
Isradipine vs propranolol in hydrochlorothiazide-treated hypertensives. A multicenter evaluation.伊拉地平与普萘洛尔治疗氢氯噻嗪控制的高血压患者的多中心评估
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2453-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Statin Use and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival: A Population-Based Cohort Study.他汀类药物的使用与肌萎缩侧索硬化症的生存率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Mar;32(3):e70095. doi: 10.1111/ene.70095.
2
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
3
Benefits and risks of antihypertensive medication in adults with different systolic blood pressure: A meta-analysis from the perspective of the number needed to treat.
不同收缩压水平的成年患者使用抗高血压药物的获益与风险:基于治疗所需人数视角的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 19;9:986502. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.986502. eCollection 2022.
4
Characteristics of Populations Excluded From Clinical Trials Supporting Intensive Blood Pressure Control Guidelines.支持强化血压控制指南的临床试验排除人群的特征。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019707. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019707. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Thiazide Diuretic-Induced Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.噻嗪类利尿剂引起的空腹血糖变化:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1849-1860. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05731-3. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Are the effects of blood pressure lowering treatment diminishing?: meta-regression analyses.降压治疗的效果正在减弱吗?:Meta回归分析
Clin Hypertens. 2018 Nov 15;24:16. doi: 10.1186/s40885-018-0101-9. eCollection 2018.
7
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension.轻度高血压低危患者降压治疗的获益与危害。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1626-1634. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684.
8
Renal Denervation After Symplicity HTN-3 - Back to Basics. Review of the Evidence.Symplicity HTN-3研究后肾去神经支配——回归基础。证据综述。
Eur Cardiol. 2014 Dec;9(2):110-114. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2014.9.2.110.
9
The Origins and Early Evolution of Epidemiologic Research in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Tabular Record of Cohort and Case-Control Studies and Preventive Trials Initiated From 1946 to 1976.心血管疾病流行病学研究的起源和早期演变:1946 年至 1976 年启动的队列和病例对照研究以及预防试验的表格记录。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy175.
10
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.