Hessling J J, Miller S E, Levy N L
J Immunol Methods. 1980;38(3-4):315-24. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(80)90280-x.
Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures has been shown to perturb a number of immunologic parameters. Because such contamination is almost always introduced in the laboratory, the immunologist requires a procedure to screen his cell lines frequently for mycoplasma. Two procedures recently described for the detection of mycoplasma in cell cultures, the uridine-uracil incorporation procedure and a direct fluorescent assay, were compared with the standard procedures of agar culture and transmission electron microscopy. The results with uridine-uracil incorporation were totally non-concordant with those of any of the other 3 procedures and, moreover, were inconsistent through serial assays on the same cell culture. In contrast, the direct fluorescent assay, using the fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, yielded consistent results in full agreement with the agar culture data. Since the fluorescent assay is rapid and has discriminatory capability at least equivalent to that of agar culture, it would appear to be the method of choice for routine screening of cell cultures for mycoplasma.
细胞培养中的支原体污染已被证明会干扰许多免疫学参数。由于这种污染几乎总是在实验室中引入的,免疫学家需要一种程序来频繁地对他的细胞系进行支原体筛查。最近描述的两种用于检测细胞培养中支原体的程序,即尿苷 - 尿嘧啶掺入程序和直接荧光测定法,与琼脂培养和透射电子显微镜的标准程序进行了比较。尿苷 - 尿嘧啶掺入法的结果与其他三种程序中的任何一种都完全不一致,而且,在对同一细胞培养物进行的系列测定中也不一致。相比之下,使用荧光染料Hoechst 33258的直接荧光测定法产生了与琼脂培养数据完全一致的一致结果。由于荧光测定法快速且具有至少与琼脂培养相当的鉴别能力,它似乎是细胞培养物中支原体常规筛查的首选方法。