Rej R, Bretaudiere J P, Graffunder B
Clin Chem. 1981 Apr;27(4):535-42.
Six procedures were evaluated for aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1) isoenzyme assay in human serum and tissue homogenates. Results of procedures based on immunochemical precipitation by use of antibodies directed against either the mitochondrial or (with greater precision) soluble isoenzyme correlated well with those by a differential kinetic assay involving both different pH conditions and adipate inhibition. Results with a DEAE-Sephadex ion-exchange chromatographic procedure correlated well with these techniques for specimens containing purified isoenzymes, but showed substantial positive bias for determination of the mitochondrial isoenzyme in human serum. An assay based on the differential effects of pH alone discriminated between the isoenzymes with less bias than did the chromatographic assay. Precision of the two differential pH assays was limited by significant reagent blank activity resulting from destruction of NADH at pH 6.0 or 6.2. An electrophoretic procedure in which diazonium salt is used to make oxalacetate visible was least accurate for measuring samples for which the isoenzyme composition was known.
对六种用于人血清和组织匀浆中天冬氨酸转氨酶(EC 2.6.1.1)同工酶测定的方法进行了评估。基于使用针对线粒体或(更精确地)可溶性同工酶的抗体进行免疫化学沉淀的方法的结果,与涉及不同pH条件和己二酸抑制的差异动力学测定法的结果相关性良好。对于含有纯化同工酶的标本,DEAE-葡聚糖离子交换色谱法的结果与这些技术相关性良好,但在测定人血清中线粒体同工酶时显示出相当大的正偏差。仅基于pH差异效应的测定法比色谱测定法以更小的偏差区分同工酶。两种差异pH测定法的精密度受到pH 6.0或6.2时NADH破坏导致的显著试剂空白活性的限制。使用重氮盐使草酰乙酸可见的电泳方法在测量已知同工酶组成的样品时最不准确。