Bubrick M P, Lundeen J W, Hitchcock C R
Surgery. 1981 Apr;89(4):454-9.
A radiographic animal study comparing two-layer and hand-sewn colorectal anastomoses to anastomoses made with an inverting circular stapling device revealed a highly significant difference in anastomotic leak rate: 13 anastomotic dehiscences were demonstrated in 20 dogs with hand-sewn anastomosis (65%), and four leaks (20%) were found in 20 dogs with stapled anastomoses. All leaks occurred between the third and seventh postoperative days and most were not clinically significant. A marginally significant difference in mortality rate was found, with four deaths among the hand-sewn group (20%) and two among the stapled group (10%). The data suggest that the EEA stapling device may be preferable to hand-sewn techniques, particularly for low extraperitoneal colorectal anastomoses.
一项影像学动物研究比较了两层手工缝合的结直肠吻合术与使用圆形吻合器进行的吻合术,结果显示吻合口漏率存在高度显著差异:20只接受手工缝合吻合术的犬中有13例吻合口裂开(65%),20只接受吻合器吻合术的犬中有4例出现漏口(20%)。所有漏口均发生在术后第3天至第7天之间,且大多数在临床上并不严重。死亡率存在轻微显著差异,手工缝合组有4只死亡(20%),吻合器组有2只死亡(10%)。数据表明,对于低位腹膜外结直肠吻合术,EEA吻合器可能比手工缝合技术更可取。