Evans T M, Waarvick C E, Seidler R J, LeChevallier M W
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jan;41(1):130-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.1.130-138.1981.
A procedure was developed to detect false-negative reactions (interference) in the standard most-probable-number (S-MPN) technique for coliform enumeration of untreated surface water and potable water supplies. This modified MPN (M-MPN) procedure allowed a quantitative assessment of the interference with coliform detection in untreated surface water and potable water supplies. Coliform interference was found to occur in the presumptive, confirmed, and completed tests of the S-MPN technique. When coliforms were present, interference with their detection occurred in over 80% of the samples. The inferior nature of the S-MPN was revealed by the 100% increase in the incidence of completed coliform-positive drinking water samples obtained with the M-MPN technique. The M-MPN procedure was also superior to the standard membrane filter technique. Eight different species of coliforms were recovered from false-negative tests, including Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Escherichia coli (in decreasing order of occurrence). The use of standard MPN techniques for monitoring potable water supplies may lead to a false security that the drinking water supply is potable, i.e., free from indicator bacteria.
已开发出一种程序,用于检测未经处理的地表水和饮用水供应中大肠菌群计数的标准最大可能数(S-MPN)技术中的假阴性反应(干扰)。这种改良的MPN(M-MPN)程序能够对未经处理的地表水和饮用水供应中大肠菌群检测的干扰进行定量评估。发现大肠菌群干扰出现在S-MPN技术的初发酵、确证和完成试验中。当存在大肠菌群时,超过80%的样本中出现了对其检测的干扰。M-MPN技术获得的大肠菌群阳性饮用水样本发生率增加了100%,这揭示了S-MPN的劣势。M-MPN程序也优于标准膜过滤技术。从假阴性试验中分离出了8种不同的大肠菌群,包括柠檬酸杆菌、肠杆菌、克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌(出现频率由高到低)。使用标准MPN技术监测饮用水供应可能会导致一种错误的安全感,即认为饮用水供应是可饮用的,也就是不含指示菌。