Evans T M, LeChevallier M W, Waarvick C E, Seidler R J
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Mar;41(3):657-63. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.3.657-663.1981.
The species of total coliform bacteria isolated from drinking water and untreated surface water by the membrane filter (MF), the standard most-probable-number (S-MPN), and modified most-probable-number (M-MPN) techniques were compared. Each coliform detection technique selected for a different profile of coliform species from both types of water samples. The MF technique indicated that Citrobacter freundii was the most common coliform species in water samples. However, the fermentation tube techniques displayed selectivity towards the isolation of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella. The M-MPN technique selected for more C. freundii and Enterobacter spp. from untreated surface water samples and for more Enterobacter and Klebsiella spp. from drinking water samples than did the S-MPN technique. The lack of agreement between the number of coliforms detected in a water sample by the S-MPN, M-MPN, and MF techniques was a result of the selection for different coliform species by the various techniques.
采用膜过滤(MF)法、标准最大可能数(S-MPN)法和改良最大可能数(M-MPN)法,对从饮用水和未处理地表水分离出的总大肠菌群细菌种类进行了比较。每种大肠菌群检测技术从两种水样中选择出不同的大肠菌群种类分布。MF技术表明弗氏柠檬酸杆菌是水样中最常见的大肠菌群种类。然而,发酵管技术对大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌的分离具有选择性。与S-MPN技术相比,M-MPN技术从未处理地表水样品中选出了更多的弗氏柠檬酸杆菌和肠杆菌属,从饮用水样品中选出了更多的肠杆菌属和克雷伯菌属。S-MPN法、M-MPN法和MF技术在水样中检测出的大肠菌群数量不一致,是由于各种技术对不同大肠菌群种类的选择所致。