Suppr超能文献

用于潮湿表面细菌学采样的膜滤器接触技术。

Membrane filter contact technique for bacteriological sampling of moist surfaces.

作者信息

Craythorn J M, Barbour A G, Matsen J M, Britt M R, Garibaldi R A

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):250-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.2.250-255.1980.

Abstract

We used a membrane filter contact technique to pick up and grow bacteria from artificially contaminated surfaces. We were able to recover individual colony-forming units (CFU) of Staphylococcus aureus from a moist agar surface more efficiently with 3- and 5- micron membrane filters than with Rodac plates, velvet pads, velveteen pads, or smaller-pore membrane filters. The effective transfer of bacteria with the 3- and 5-micron membrane filters was 0.96 +/- 0.04 (standard error of the mean) and 0.99 +/- 0.04, respectively, as compared to 0.49 +/- 0.03 for Rodac plates, 0.09 +/- 0.01 velvet pad imprints, 0.05 +/- 0.01 for velveteen pad imprints, 0.27 +/- 0.02 for velvet pad rinses, 0.005 +/- 0.001 for velveteen pad rinses, 0.39 +/- 0.02 for 0.45-micron filters, and 0.85 +/-0.05 for 1.2 micron filters. In addition, the recovery of S. aureus from contaminated bovine muscle surfaces with the 5-microns membrane filter was similar to that of quantitative dilutions of biopsy material and was significantly higher than the recovery from Rodac plates. The 5-microns membrane filters on a paddle recovered 52 +/- 5 CFU/cm2 from artificially contaminated bovine skeletal muscle, the quantitative dilutions of biopsy recovered 69 +/- 5 CFU/cm2, and the Rodac plate recovered 5 +/- 3 CFU/cm2. Sampling of moist surfaces by the membrane filter contact technique is easy to perform and highly efficient; our data suggest that it could be employed for cultures of clinical surfaces such as surgical wounds or burns.

摘要

我们采用膜滤器接触技术从人工污染的表面采集并培养细菌。与罗达克平板、天鹅绒垫、平绒垫或小孔径膜滤器相比,使用3微米和5微米的膜滤器能更有效地从潮湿的琼脂表面分离出金黄色葡萄球菌的单个菌落形成单位(CFU)。3微米和5微米膜滤器转移细菌的有效率分别为0.96±0.04(均值标准误差)和0.99±0.04,而罗达克平板为0.49±0.03,天鹅绒垫印记为0.09±0.01,平绒垫印记为0.05±0.01,天鹅绒垫冲洗液为0.27±0.02,平绒垫冲洗液为0.005±0.001,0.45微米滤器为0.39±0.02,1.2微米滤器为0.85±0.05。此外,用5微米膜滤器从受污染的牛肌肉表面回收金黄色葡萄球菌的效果与活检材料定量稀释法相似,且显著高于用罗达克平板回收的效果。用桨板上的5微米膜滤器从人工污染的牛骨骼肌中回收的菌落数为52±5 CFU/cm²,活检材料定量稀释法回收的菌落数为69±5 CFU/cm²,罗达克平板回收的菌落数为5±3 CFU/cm²。通过膜滤器接触技术对潮湿表面进行采样操作简便且效率高;我们的数据表明,该技术可用于外科伤口或烧伤等临床表面的培养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad52/273562/9540ee5e8806/jcm00169-0137-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验