Dee T H, Johnson G M, Berger C S
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Apr;13(4):750-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.750-753.1981.
Many serological techniques have been developed to aid in the discrimination of significant candidiasis from other clinical states. Serum anti-candida precipitin and agglutinin quantification by counterimmunoelectrophoresis and latex agglutination were statistically evaluated as to their respective ability to accomplish this discrimination. Forty-five serum specimens from 16 patients with documented disease and 2 with presumptive disease and 81 specimens from 70 control patients were studied. The control population consisted of patients with candida colonization, transient candidemia, bacteremia, other systemic mycoses, and healthy medical personnel. The two techniques were compared as to sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a positive and a negative test. Using a precipitin or agglutinin titer of greater than or equal to 1:8 as the criterion for a positive test, we obtained the following results: counterimmunoelectrophoresis, 78, 97, 88, and 94%, respectively; latex agglutination, 94, 50, 33, and 97%, respectively.
已经开发了许多血清学技术,以帮助区分严重念珠菌病与其他临床状态。通过对流免疫电泳和乳胶凝集法对血清抗念珠菌沉淀素和凝集素进行定量,就其各自完成这种区分的能力进行了统计学评估。研究了来自16例确诊疾病患者和2例疑似疾病患者的45份血清标本,以及来自70例对照患者的81份标本。对照人群包括念珠菌定植患者、短暂念珠菌血症患者、菌血症患者、其他系统性真菌病患者和健康医护人员。比较了这两种技术的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性检测的预测价值。以沉淀素或凝集素滴度大于或等于1:8作为阳性检测标准,我们得到了以下结果:对流免疫电泳的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78%、97%、88%和94%;乳胶凝集法的相应结果分别为94%、50%、33%和97%。