Ryder W, Wright P A
Anaesthesia. 1981 May;36(5):492-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb10285.x.
A clinical trial was designed to compare the use of halothane and enflurane in outpatient dental anaesthesia. A wholly inhalational technique was chosen. Basal nitrous oxide and oxygen was delivered from a Walton V demand-flow machine and was supplemented alternately with halothane or enflurane delivered from paired Goldman vaporisers in series. Under these circumstances, enflurane produced significantly fewer dysrhythmias than halothane, but was a more difficult, more expensive and less versatile agent to use. Overall, it was considered inferior to halothane in this context except, perhaps, where repeat anaesthetics may be required at short intervals of time.
设计了一项临床试验，以比较氟烷和恩氟烷在门诊牙科麻醉中的应用。采用全吸入技术。基础氧化亚氮和氧气由沃尔顿V型按需流量机器提供，并交替补充串联的成对戈德曼蒸发器输送的氟烷或恩氟烷。在这种情况下，恩氟烷产生的心律失常明显少于氟烷，但它使用起来更困难、更昂贵且通用性更差。总体而言，在这种情况下，它被认为不如氟烷，也许在短时间间隔可能需要重复麻醉的情况除外。
