Koretzky M B, Kohn M, Jeger A M
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978 Sep;36(9):1054-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.36.9.1054.
A study was conducted to measure cross-situational consistency of the orthogonal dimensions of the two-factor model of social-emotional functioning. According to this model, large proportions of variance in social-emotional functioning can be accounted for by two orthogonal, highly replicable dimensions. The setting was Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls, a long-term institution for emotionally disturbed and delinquent youths; the subjects were 206 residents of varied ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Cross-situational correlations between school and cottage settings were found to be .52 for Factor II (Cooperation-Compliance versus Anger-Defiance) and .42 for Factor I (Interest-Participation versus Apathy-Withdrawal). The results confirm the consistency and discriminant validity hypotheses--specifically, correlations between the corresponding factors of different instruments measuring behavior in different settings were large, whereas correlations between noncorresponding factors were very low. The value of using broad, higher order factors in personality research on the trait versus situation issue is discussed.
一项研究旨在测量社会情感功能两因素模型正交维度的跨情境一致性。根据该模型,社会情感功能中很大比例的方差可以由两个正交的、高度可复制的维度来解释。研究地点是霍桑-雪松丘,这是一家为情绪困扰和违法青少年设立的长期机构;研究对象是206名来自不同种族和社会经济背景的居民。发现学校和宿舍环境之间关于因素二(合作-顺从与愤怒-违抗)的跨情境相关性为0.52,关于因素一(兴趣-参与与冷漠-退缩)的相关性为0.42。结果证实了一致性和区分效度假设——具体而言,在不同环境中测量行为的不同工具的相应因素之间的相关性很大,而非相应因素之间的相关性非常低。文中讨论了在人格研究中关于特质与情境问题使用宽泛的高阶因素的价值。