Kohn M, Jeger A M, Koretzky M B
Am J Community Psychol. 1979 Oct;7(5):481-95. doi: 10.1007/BF00894045.
A study was conducted to test the usefulness of the two-factor model in assessing social environments. Subjects were residents and staff at a residential treatment center for emotionally disturbed and/or delinquent boys and girls. Rating instruments consisted of (a) two parallel versions of Moos' Community-Oriented Programs Enivronment Scale (COPES), each worded so as to be appropriate to the setting being measured, and (b) global ratings of satisfaction with the environment. Principal component factor analyses, carried out separately on the youths' COPES-School and the youths' COPES-Cottage, yielded two orthogonal but similar factors in each environment. In a comparison with Moos' three-dimensional formulation of the social milieu, the two factors strongly resembled two of Moos' dimensions but were more independent, had greater validity, and discriminated between the two environments at a higher level of significance. The instruments derived from the factor analyses provide a simple procedure for assessing a variety of treatment programs and populations.
开展了一项研究,以检验双因素模型在评估社会环境方面的效用。研究对象是一家为情绪困扰和/或违法犯罪的男孩女孩设立的寄宿治疗中心的居民和工作人员。评定工具包括:(a) 穆斯的社区导向项目环境量表(COPES)的两个平行版本,每个版本的措辞都适合所测量的环境,以及 (b) 对环境满意度的总体评定。分别对青少年的学校版COPES和青少年的宿舍版COPES进行主成分因子分析,在每个环境中都得出了两个相互正交但相似的因子。与穆斯对社会环境的三维表述相比,这两个因子与穆斯的两个维度非常相似,但更为独立,具有更高的效度,并且在更高的显著性水平上区分了这两个环境。因子分析得出的工具为评估各种治疗项目和人群提供了一个简单的程序。