• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保密性与医疗记录。

Confidentiality and medical records.

作者信息

Jones R V, Richards S J

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 Mar;28(188):137-40.

PMID:702427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2158775/
Abstract

Protecting confidential information disclosed to doctors has been one of the most important ethical traditions of the medical profession. However, the patient's right to such confidentiality is threatened because it is legally unclear how far ownership by Government of the paper on which NHS records are kept or of the computer system in which they are stored confers right of access.We hope the medical profession will examine this problem urgently and offer some suggestions as to how patients' confidences can continue to be protected in the future.

摘要

保护向医生披露的机密信息一直是医学专业最重要的伦理传统之一。然而,患者对这种保密性的权利受到了威胁,因为在法律上尚不清楚,保存国民健康保险制度记录的纸张或存储这些记录的计算机系统的政府所有权在多大程度上赋予了访问权。我们希望医学专业人士能紧急审视这个问题,并就未来如何继续保护患者的隐私提供一些建议。

相似文献

1
Confidentiality and medical records.保密性与医疗记录。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 Mar;28(188):137-40.
2
The legal and ethical aspects of telemedicine. 1: Confidentiality and the patient's rights of access.远程医疗的法律与伦理问题。1:保密性与患者的获取权
J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3(4):179-87. doi: 10.1258/1357633971931101.
3
Confidentiality: the confusion continues.保密性:困惑仍在继续。
J Med Ethics. 1982 Mar;8(1):9-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.8.1.9.
4
From Hippocrates to facsimile. Protecting patient confidentiality is more difficult and more important than ever before.从希波克拉底时代到传真时代。保护患者隐私比以往任何时候都更加困难和重要。
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 15;156(6):847-52.
5
Medical confidentiality after a patient's death, with particular reference to The Netherlands.
Med Law. 2001;20(2):215-20.
6
Disaster easily averted? Data confidentiality and the hospital desktop computer.灾难是否轻易避免?数据保密性与医院台式电脑。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 May;83(5):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Confidentiality in the National Health Service and in the service for sexually transmitted diseases.国民医疗服务体系及性传播疾病服务中的保密问题。
Br J Vener Dis. 1980 Aug;56(4):263-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.56.4.263.
8
Confidentiality of medical records--a factless debate.医疗记录的保密性——一场毫无根据的辩论。
Lancet. 1980 Dec 6;2(8206):1230-1.
9
Confidentiality, records, and computers.保密性、记录与计算机。
Br Med J. 1979 Mar 10;1(6164):698-9.
10
Protection of computerized medical data--a problem?计算机化医疗数据的保护——一个问题?
S Afr Med J. 1985 Jul 20;68(2):106-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Giving patients a copy of their computer medical record.向患者提供其计算机病历的副本。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Feb;32(235):80-6.
2
Medical records in general practice.全科医疗中的医疗记录。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 Sep;28(194):521-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Confidentiality in the setting of general practice.全科医疗中的保密性。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1973 Dec;23(137):881-5.
2
Research and confidentiality in general practice.全科医疗中的研究与保密
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1973 Dec;23(137):863-79.
3
A computer record-keeping system for general practice.一种用于全科医疗的计算机记录保存系统。
Br Med J. 1976 Jun 5;1(6022):1395-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6022.1395.
4
Dextroamphetamine with morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain.右旋苯丙胺与吗啡联合用于治疗术后疼痛。
N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):712-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961303.